<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: LACP on Cisco firepower 4120 in cluster in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/lacp-on-cisco-firepower-4120-in-cluster/m-p/3682179#M132794</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks a lot&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2018 15:02:21 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>marine253</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-08-06T15:02:21Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>LACP on Cisco firepower 4120 in cluster</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/lacp-on-cisco-firepower-4120-in-cluster/m-p/3681507#M132787</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello ,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I am planning to put 2 Cisco firepower in cluster.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;For redundancy purposes , i was planning on performing LACP on the firepower for my trunked (about 50 vlans) interfaces. Is this feasible?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The firepower will be connected to a 3850 stack.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 11:07:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/lacp-on-cisco-firepower-4120-in-cluster/m-p/3681507#M132787</guid>
      <dc:creator>marine253</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-12T11:07:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: LACP on Cisco firepower 4120 in cluster</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/lacp-on-cisco-firepower-4120-in-cluster/m-p/3681576#M132791</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes, you should be able to do this. In an active/standby failover, both interfaces on FTD1 will be on the same port-channel on the switch stack while interfaces on FTD2 will be a different port-channel. Should be similar for a active/active cluster connection, but the data ports will be part of same port channel on the switch.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2018 21:38:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/lacp-on-cisco-firepower-4120-in-cluster/m-p/3681576#M132791</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rahul Govindan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-08-05T21:38:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: LACP on Cisco firepower 4120 in cluster</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/lacp-on-cisco-firepower-4120-in-cluster/m-p/3682179#M132794</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks a lot&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2018 15:02:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/lacp-on-cisco-firepower-4120-in-cluster/m-p/3682179#M132794</guid>
      <dc:creator>marine253</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-08-06T15:02:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

