<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic It gives that result when the in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-route-clean-up/m-p/3083842#M134105</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;It gives that result when the config is already clean (no unused objects or ACLs).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You can put a dummy object into the pasted config if you want to verify the tool catches it.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2017 09:11:38 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Marvin Rhoads</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-07-13T09:11:38Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ASA route clean up</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-route-clean-up/m-p/3083839#M134100</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;hi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;G class="gr_ gr_31 gr-alert gr_tiny gr_spell gr_inline_cards gr_run_anim ContextualSpelling multiReplace" id="31" data-gr-id="31"&gt;i&lt;/G&gt; need to do some ASA clean which includes ACL, &lt;G class="gr_ gr_30 gr-alert gr_gramm gr_inline_cards gr_run_anim Punctuation only-ins replaceWithoutSep" id="30" data-gr-id="30"&gt;NAT&lt;/G&gt; and objects.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;G class="gr_ gr_33 gr-alert gr_spell gr_inline_cards gr_run_anim ContextualSpelling multiReplace" id="33" data-gr-id="33"&gt;i've&lt;/G&gt; been searching around and noticed these are the common ASA config clean up items.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;G class="gr_ gr_34 gr-alert gr_spell gr_inline_cards gr_run_anim ContextualSpelling multiReplace" id="34" data-gr-id="34"&gt;i'm&lt;/G&gt; not sure if ASA has a way of checking 'active' routes (usually static). my question, is there a way to check via CLI or ASDM?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;can this be considered a 'best practice' for an ASA config clean up?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;G class="gr_ gr_35 gr-alert gr_spell gr_inline_cards gr_run_anim ContextualSpelling multiReplace" id="35" data-gr-id="35"&gt;i've&lt;/G&gt; installed Solarwinds' FSM and trying to play around with it. any advice on this tool? or can someone give his view/recommendation?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;can someone able to share his/her experience when doing an ASA clean up? any best practice or recommendations? links?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 09:41:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-route-clean-up/m-p/3083839#M134100</guid>
      <dc:creator>johnlloyd_13</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-12T09:41:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>I've used FSM once or twice</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-route-clean-up/m-p/3083840#M134102</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I've used FSM once or twice years back even before SolarWinds acquired it (used to be called FirePac) from Athena. I liked it but now i see SolarWinds is discontinuing it. &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":disappointed_face:"&gt;😞&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Lately I use the tunnelsup.com tools for ACL and object cleanup.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Static routes are hard to identify as actively used or not as they depend on whether or not there is traffic presented in the data plane that ever needs them. I suppose one could go to the next hop and see if the downstream network is still reachable.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2017 08:48:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-route-clean-up/m-p/3083840#M134102</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marvin Rhoads</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-07-13T08:48:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>hi marvin,</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-route-clean-up/m-p/3083841#M134104</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;hi marvin,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;i tried to use tunnelsup.com cleanup tool but only shows me 'no items found to cleanup.'&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;anything i miss?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;H2&gt;Results&lt;/H2&gt;
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;DIV id="outputdata"&gt;! No items found to cleanup.&lt;BR /&gt;! Analyzed 221 lines of code.&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2017 09:02:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-route-clean-up/m-p/3083841#M134104</guid>
      <dc:creator>johnlloyd_13</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-07-13T09:02:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>It gives that result when the</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-route-clean-up/m-p/3083842#M134105</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It gives that result when the config is already clean (no unused objects or ACLs).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You can put a dummy object into the pasted config if you want to verify the tool catches it.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2017 09:11:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-route-clean-up/m-p/3083842#M134105</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marvin Rhoads</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-07-13T09:11:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>yes, you're right. i pasted a</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-route-clean-up/m-p/3083843#M134106</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;yes, you're right. i pasted a 'clean' config.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;i tried to put a dummy config and gave me this result.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;looks like this might be a handy tool.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;H2&gt;Results&lt;/H2&gt;
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;DIV id="outputdata"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;! Unused object found; suggest removing it&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;no object network INSIDE-SUBNET&lt;BR /&gt;! Analyzed 2 lines of code.&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2017 01:30:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-route-clean-up/m-p/3083843#M134106</guid>
      <dc:creator>johnlloyd_13</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-07-14T01:30:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>hi marvin,</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-route-clean-up/m-p/3083844#M134107</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;hi marvin,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;could you advise how to determine if NAT are unused? they should NOT appear &lt;STRONG&gt;show xlate&lt;/STRONG&gt; right?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;i could see some NAT translation but idle time is VERY LONG.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;flags sIT idle 414:12:19 timeout 0:00:00&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;i also checked static NAT displayed on &lt;STRONG&gt;show xlate&lt;/STRONG&gt; but didn't appear in &lt;STRONG&gt;show conn&lt;/STRONG&gt; or &lt;STRONG&gt;show local-host&lt;/STRONG&gt; output. which output should i refer or follow in order to remove static NAT config?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2017 03:33:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-route-clean-up/m-p/3083844#M134107</guid>
      <dc:creator>johnlloyd_13</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-07-19T03:33:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Unused NAT can be very</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-route-clean-up/m-p/3083845#M134108</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Unused NAT can be very challenging as it requires more of a business/technical discussion with the customer vs. straight analysis of the configuration.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;For instance, consider a VM that is only powered on during certain conditions but when it is up it requires a static NAT. You will not see any output for it from the show commands you mentioned unless it is active. So one might think it is OK to remove. But if next week it is powered up, the firewall will cause the business process to break.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You might get some clues from internal DNS if the host address is unknown and currently not reachable. Also, internal routing or site-site VPN crypto map definitions may highlight NAT rules that point to non-existent subnets or no longer active locations.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2017 04:08:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-route-clean-up/m-p/3083845#M134108</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marvin Rhoads</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-07-19T04:08:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>it's challenging indeed!</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-route-clean-up/m-p/3083846#M134110</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;it's challenging indeed!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;i'll just run through it and consult with customer/stakeholders if they still need the NAT line.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2017 04:40:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-route-clean-up/m-p/3083846#M134110</guid>
      <dc:creator>johnlloyd_13</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-07-19T04:40:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

