<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic ASA 5525-X Sub-interface Support in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-5525-x-sub-interface-support/m-p/2954219#M148769</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello Everyone,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Our organisation maintains customer networks remotely and all the clients are segregated based on VRF (ex VRFa is customer 1 , VRFb is customer 2 stc.). This VRF is configured on the Routers through which we get connected to client's network either over MPLS, P2P link etc.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Our internal servers are currently exiting through a Transparent Mode firewall to reach the Routers, which is now planned to replace with a ASA (No plan to implement ASA in transparent mode). The design requires 1 sub-interface for each client and now I am stumbling upon the fact that ASA 5525-X supports only upto 200 VLANS/Subinterfaces.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Unfortunately the overall design needs 2 Sub-interfaces for each client, theoretically i can probably support upto 100 clients only. Now the question which i have is, is there a way to increase the number of VLANS supported on this firewall? If yes how?.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Appreciate your responses&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 08:29:52 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>MSIS SOC</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-03-12T08:29:52Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ASA 5525-X Sub-interface Support</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-5525-x-sub-interface-support/m-p/2954219#M148769</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello Everyone,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Our organisation maintains customer networks remotely and all the clients are segregated based on VRF (ex VRFa is customer 1 , VRFb is customer 2 stc.). This VRF is configured on the Routers through which we get connected to client's network either over MPLS, P2P link etc.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Our internal servers are currently exiting through a Transparent Mode firewall to reach the Routers, which is now planned to replace with a ASA (No plan to implement ASA in transparent mode). The design requires 1 sub-interface for each client and now I am stumbling upon the fact that ASA 5525-X supports only upto 200 VLANS/Subinterfaces.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Unfortunately the overall design needs 2 Sub-interfaces for each client, theoretically i can probably support upto 100 clients only. Now the question which i have is, is there a way to increase the number of VLANS supported on this firewall? If yes how?.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Appreciate your responses&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 08:29:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-5525-x-sub-interface-support/m-p/2954219#M148769</guid>
      <dc:creator>MSIS SOC</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-12T08:29:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>I'm not aware of a way to</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-5525-x-sub-interface-support/m-p/2954220#M148770</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm not aware of a way to increase the limit. But the limit is based on the model, the bigger ASAs have a higher limit, but also with the 5555-X it's "only" 500 VLANs. If you don't need the higher inspection-throughput, then a router with firewall feature-set is probably the more flexible&amp;nbsp;solution.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2016 10:27:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-5525-x-sub-interface-support/m-p/2954220#M148770</guid>
      <dc:creator>Karsten Iwen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-11-06T10:27:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

