<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Syntax Changes from ASA Version 9.2(4) to ASA Version 9.6.2 in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/syntax-changes-from-asa-version-9-2-4-to-asa-version-9-6-2/m-p/2991840#M150280</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;We have a few ASAs with Version 9.2(4) that we are looking to upgrade to the latest software version 9.6.2. Are there any concerns I should have in regards to NAT Statements and ACLs between these two? Thanks for the help.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 08:13:40 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Eric York</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-03-12T08:13:40Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Syntax Changes from ASA Version 9.2(4) to ASA Version 9.6.2</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/syntax-changes-from-asa-version-9-2-4-to-asa-version-9-6-2/m-p/2991840#M150280</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We have a few ASAs with Version 9.2(4) that we are looking to upgrade to the latest software version 9.6.2. Are there any concerns I should have in regards to NAT Statements and ACLs between these two? Thanks for the help.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 08:13:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/syntax-changes-from-asa-version-9-2-4-to-asa-version-9-6-2/m-p/2991840#M150280</guid>
      <dc:creator>Eric York</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-12T08:13:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hi</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/syntax-changes-from-asa-version-9-2-4-to-asa-version-9-6-2/m-p/2991841#M150281</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;From 9.2 to 9.6, there isn't any changes in need to take into consideration except if you're using Firepower.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Check the release note for firepower changes: http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/asa/asa96/release/notes/asarn96.pdf&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;PS: Please don't forget to rate and mark as correct answer if this answered your question&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2016 14:52:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/syntax-changes-from-asa-version-9-2-4-to-asa-version-9-6-2/m-p/2991841#M150281</guid>
      <dc:creator>Francesco Molino</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-09-02T14:52:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hi,There are no such changes</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/syntax-changes-from-asa-version-9-2-4-to-asa-version-9-6-2/m-p/2991842#M150282</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;There are no such changes with NAT and ACL in 9.2.x and 9.6.x. You can directly move to version 9.6.2 after taking the complete backup of your current configuration. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Please find the below document for your reference. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/asa/asa96/release/notes/asarn96.html#ID-2152-0000000a" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/asa/asa96/release/notes/asarn96.html#ID-2152-0000000a&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The major changes happens with respect to NAT and ACL with version pre 8.3 and post 8.3.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards&lt;BR /&gt;Pradyumna&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2016 14:53:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/syntax-changes-from-asa-version-9-2-4-to-asa-version-9-6-2/m-p/2991842#M150282</guid>
      <dc:creator>pradypan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-09-02T14:53:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>We are using Virtual</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/syntax-changes-from-asa-version-9-2-4-to-asa-version-9-6-2/m-p/2991843#M150283</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We are using Virtual Management Center. Will be upgrading that to 6.1.0. That's the reason for the latest updates on all of our ASAs ahead of time.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2016 15:11:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/syntax-changes-from-asa-version-9-2-4-to-asa-version-9-6-2/m-p/2991843#M150283</guid>
      <dc:creator>Eric York</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-09-02T15:11:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Any other known concerns I</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/syntax-changes-from-asa-version-9-2-4-to-asa-version-9-6-2/m-p/2991844#M150284</link>
      <description>Any other known concerns I should be aware of?</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2016 15:20:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/syntax-changes-from-asa-version-9-2-4-to-asa-version-9-6-2/m-p/2991844#M150284</guid>
      <dc:creator>Eric York</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-09-02T15:20:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ok. You won't face any</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/syntax-changes-from-asa-version-9-2-4-to-asa-version-9-6-2/m-p/2991845#M150285</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;ok. You won't face any configuration command issue with this migration step.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;PS: Please don't forget to rate and mark as correct answer if this answered your question&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2016 15:24:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/syntax-changes-from-asa-version-9-2-4-to-asa-version-9-6-2/m-p/2991845#M150285</guid>
      <dc:creator>Francesco Molino</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-09-02T15:24:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

