<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic 500/udp - Internet Key in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa/m-p/2982936#M150344</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;500/udp - Internet Key Exchange (IKE)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;500/tcp - sometimes used for IKE over TCP&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;TCP guarantees delivery of data packets on port &lt;B&gt;500&lt;/B&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; in the same order in which they were sent. Guaranteed communication over TCP port &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;B&gt;500&lt;/B&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; is the main difference between TCP and UDP. UDP port &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;B&gt;500&lt;/B&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; would not have guaranteed communication as TCP. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2016 06:56:04 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Pawan Raut</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-09-01T06:56:04Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ASA</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa/m-p/2982934#M150340</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Can we implement ACL for port 500 with TCP? On some sites it is mentioned as both TCP and UDP but never saw any rule with port 500 on TCP. If so then what would be the scenario and use of 500 on TCP?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 08:12:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa/m-p/2982934#M150340</guid>
      <dc:creator>ankit.dhawan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-12T08:12:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hello; </title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa/m-p/2982935#M150341</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;For TCP and UDP there is no problem. You can configure an access list with Any Valid TCP/UDP port and apply to the ASA.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Mike.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2016 21:04:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa/m-p/2982935#M150341</guid>
      <dc:creator>Maykol Rojas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-08-31T21:04:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>500/udp - Internet Key</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa/m-p/2982936#M150344</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;500/udp - Internet Key Exchange (IKE)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;500/tcp - sometimes used for IKE over TCP&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;TCP guarantees delivery of data packets on port &lt;B&gt;500&lt;/B&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; in the same order in which they were sent. Guaranteed communication over TCP port &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;B&gt;500&lt;/B&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; is the main difference between TCP and UDP. UDP port &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;B&gt;500&lt;/B&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; would not have guaranteed communication as TCP. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2016 06:56:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa/m-p/2982936#M150344</guid>
      <dc:creator>Pawan Raut</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-09-01T06:56:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

