<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Hi Philip, in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ospf-behavior-after-upgrading-asa5512/m-p/2910369#M153111</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Philip,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I would need to do the upgrade and downgrade again to get the logs but I haven't seen anything in particular.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;But if it was a NAT issue, wouldn't it be happening on the current version as well?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank you!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2016 12:38:59 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>PiEich</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-06-13T12:38:59Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>OSPF behavior after upgrading ASA5512</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ospf-behavior-after-upgrading-asa5512/m-p/2910367#M153109</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi guys,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I have this weird OSPF behavior and I don't get it...&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I'm running version 9.1(4) on ASA5512, this is the output for some of the routes:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE class="prettyprint"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: courier new,courier,monospace; font-size: 8pt;"&gt;FW1DC1# sh ver&lt;BR /&gt;Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance Software Version 9.1(4)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;FW1DC1# sh route | inc 192.168.30.0&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: courier new,courier,monospace; font-size: 8pt;"&gt;O E2 192.168.30.0 255.255.255.248 [110/1] via 192.168.30.162, 0:01:40, TASA&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: courier new,courier,monospace; font-size: 8pt;"&gt;FW1DC1# sh route | inc 192.168.30.8&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: courier new,courier,monospace; font-size: 8pt;"&gt;O E2 192.168.30.8 255.255.255.248 [110/1] via 192.168.30.162, 0:02:20, TASA&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: courier new,courier,monospace; font-size: 8pt;"&gt;FW1DC1# sh route | inc 192.168.30.16&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: courier new,courier,monospace; font-size: 8pt;"&gt;O E2 192.168.30.16 255.255.255.248 [110/40] via 192.168.30.170, 0:02:23, L3&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: courier new,courier,monospace; font-size: 8pt;"&gt;FW1DC1# sh route | inc 192.168.30.24&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: courier new,courier,monospace; font-size: 8pt;"&gt;O E2 192.168.30.24 255.255.255.248 [110/40] via 192.168.30.170, 0:03:17, L3&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: courier new,courier,monospace; font-size: 8pt;"&gt;FW1DC1# sh route | inc 192.168.30.32&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: courier new,courier,monospace; font-size: 8pt;"&gt;O E2 192.168.30.32 255.255.255.248 [110/1] via 192.168.30.162, 0:03:29, TASA&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: courier new,courier,monospace; font-size: 8pt;"&gt;FW1DC1# sh route | inc 192.168.30.40&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: courier new,courier,monospace; font-size: 8pt;"&gt;O E2 192.168.30.40 255.255.255.248 [110/1] via 192.168.30.162, 0:03:42, TASA&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: courier new,courier,monospace; font-size: 8pt;"&gt;FW1DC1# sh route | inc 192.168.30.48&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: courier new,courier,monospace; font-size: 8pt;"&gt;O E2 192.168.30.48 255.255.255.248 [110/1] via 192.168.30.162, 0:03:44, TASA&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I do the upgrade with ASDM to 9.2(1). The same output:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE class="prettyprint"&gt;FW1DC1# sh ver&lt;BR /&gt;Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance Software Version 9.2(1)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;FW1DC1# sh route | inc 192.168.30.0&lt;BR /&gt;O E2&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 192.168.30.0 255.255.255.248&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;FW1DC1# sh route | inc 192.168.30.8&lt;BR /&gt;O E2&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 192.168.30.8 255.255.255.248&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;FW1DC1# sh route | inc 192.168.30.16&lt;BR /&gt;O E2&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 192.168.30.16 255.255.255.248&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;FW1DC1# sh route | inc 192.168.30.24&lt;BR /&gt;O E2&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 192.168.30.24 255.255.255.248&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;FW1DC1# sh route | inc 192.168.30.32&lt;BR /&gt;O E2&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 192.168.30.32 255.255.255.248&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;FW1DC1# sh route | inc 192.168.30.40&lt;BR /&gt;O E2&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 192.168.30.40 255.255.255.248&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;FW1DC1# sh route | inc 192.168.30.48&lt;BR /&gt;O E2&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 192.168.30.48 255.255.255.248&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;So after I do the upgrade, I cannot reach any of those routes and I don't know why.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;But after I downgrade to 9.1(4), it works again.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Any thoughts???&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank you!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;PS: I do the downgrade with ASDM, when the FW comes up again, the boot system still shows as 9.2(1)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE class="prettyprint"&gt;downgrade /noconfirm disk0:/asa914-smp-k8.bin disk0:/oldconfig_2016jun12_0222.cfg&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;FW1DC1# sh run | inc asa&lt;BR /&gt;boot system disk0:/asa921-smp-k8.bin&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 07:52:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ospf-behavior-after-upgrading-asa5512/m-p/2910367#M153109</guid>
      <dc:creator>PiEich</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-12T07:52:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>When it doesn't work, what</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ospf-behavior-after-upgrading-asa5512/m-p/2910368#M153110</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;When it doesn't work, what appears in the firewall logs?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I'm going to guess a NAT issue, but that is just a guess.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 12 Jun 2016 04:46:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ospf-behavior-after-upgrading-asa5512/m-p/2910368#M153110</guid>
      <dc:creator>Philip D'Ath</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-12T04:46:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hi Philip,</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ospf-behavior-after-upgrading-asa5512/m-p/2910369#M153111</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Philip,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I would need to do the upgrade and downgrade again to get the logs but I haven't seen anything in particular.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;But if it was a NAT issue, wouldn't it be happening on the current version as well?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank you!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2016 12:38:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ospf-behavior-after-upgrading-asa5512/m-p/2910369#M153111</guid>
      <dc:creator>PiEich</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-13T12:38:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The NAT engine in the ASA was</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ospf-behavior-after-upgrading-asa5512/m-p/2910370#M153112</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The NAT engine in the ASA was replaced at some version I can no longer recall. &amp;nbsp;I'm guessing you might be on either side of that boundary, and NAT might need some minor tweaking after the upgrade.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You'll see issues in the log if this is the case.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2016 20:18:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ospf-behavior-after-upgrading-asa5512/m-p/2910370#M153112</guid>
      <dc:creator>Philip D'Ath</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-13T20:18:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ah, that's right but it was</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ospf-behavior-after-upgrading-asa5512/m-p/2910371#M153113</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Ah, that's right but it was prior to 9.1(4), I think it was 8.3 or so...&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank you!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2016 00:36:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ospf-behavior-after-upgrading-asa5512/m-p/2910371#M153113</guid>
      <dc:creator>PiEich</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-14T00:36:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

