<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic I see, luckily we're on the in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/prevent-users-from-hogging-bandwidth/m-p/3000916#M155512</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I see, luckily we're on the part where we thought of migrating to a NGFW.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks though for the input.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Jeff&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2016 15:15:54 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>TECH-JEFF</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-11-17T15:15:54Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>prevent users from hogging bandwidth</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/prevent-users-from-hogging-bandwidth/m-p/3000914#M155510</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi, we have a Cisco ASA5520 as our Firewall, lately a lot of users are having some downloads, video stream, etc. Though we can see under monitoring which IP address is hogging the bandwidth, my question is, I know that only web filters are able to block sites with streaming, etc...&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Is there a bandwidth limitation which Cisco ASA can do to that specific port or IP?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Jeff&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 08:32:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/prevent-users-from-hogging-bandwidth/m-p/3000914#M155510</guid>
      <dc:creator>TECH-JEFF</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-12T08:32:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>On the ASA you can configure</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/prevent-users-from-hogging-bandwidth/m-p/3000915#M155511</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;On the ASA you can configure MPF, where you describe traffic in a class-map based on address and port. &amp;nbsp;These classes are referenced in a policy-map where you can police the traffic. That means that all traffic above the given policing-rate is dropped.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;All in all, this will be a nightmare to configure. Given that the ASA 5520 is approaching EOL, it's time to look for a replacement. The Cisco Meraki MX appliances are really powerful when it comes to traffic control like you want to do it.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2016 08:13:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/prevent-users-from-hogging-bandwidth/m-p/3000915#M155511</guid>
      <dc:creator>Karsten Iwen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-11-17T08:13:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>I see, luckily we're on the</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/prevent-users-from-hogging-bandwidth/m-p/3000916#M155512</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I see, luckily we're on the part where we thought of migrating to a NGFW.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks though for the input.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Jeff&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2016 15:15:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/prevent-users-from-hogging-bandwidth/m-p/3000916#M155512</guid>
      <dc:creator>TECH-JEFF</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-11-17T15:15:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

