<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: What is the most stable FMC version? in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/what-is-the-most-stable-fmc-version/m-p/3538096#M155880</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Stability many times depends on the particular configuration you have. In my experience, 5.4 is a stable version but as Semaj already commented, with some security issues. I am testing the 6.1 with a 5525+FP,&amp;nbsp; and so far, the FMC has been much stable and consistent showing the logs and dealing with tasks.&amp;nbsp; I like the improvements and it is not difficult to get used to the new location of some things (tasks status for example). I think is a good upgrade, but don´t forget to verify the compatibility matrix before upgrading.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2016 17:56:50 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jaime.pedraza</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-09-21T17:56:50Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>What is the most stable FMC version?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/what-is-the-most-stable-fmc-version/m-p/3538094#M155878</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Team,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I just want to know what is the most stable FMC version available in the Cisco Site.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is for ASA5545 model. I currently have 5.4.1-211 on my SFR module and 5.4.1.1-33 on my FMC.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kind regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Enrico&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2016 06:46:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/what-is-the-most-stable-fmc-version/m-p/3538094#M155878</guid>
      <dc:creator>romero_enrico</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-08-06T06:46:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: What is the most stable FMC version?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/what-is-the-most-stable-fmc-version/m-p/3538095#M155879</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Enrico,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you subscribe to the Cisco Security Advisories, it will tell you that FMC 5.4.0 has a critical vulnerability of Remote command execution. I am not sure if 5.4.1 is affected by this as well. But I am running the 6.0 version. I know there was a new release of 6.1 that just was released at the end of August.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I recommend paying attention to the vulnerabilities for your running software and make the determination to upgrade based on production opportunity. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Respectfully,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Semaj&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2016 16:01:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/what-is-the-most-stable-fmc-version/m-p/3538095#M155879</guid>
      <dc:creator>sebrjohnson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-09-07T16:01:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: What is the most stable FMC version?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/what-is-the-most-stable-fmc-version/m-p/3538096#M155880</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Stability many times depends on the particular configuration you have. In my experience, 5.4 is a stable version but as Semaj already commented, with some security issues. I am testing the 6.1 with a 5525+FP,&amp;nbsp; and so far, the FMC has been much stable and consistent showing the logs and dealing with tasks.&amp;nbsp; I like the improvements and it is not difficult to get used to the new location of some things (tasks status for example). I think is a good upgrade, but don´t forget to verify the compatibility matrix before upgrading.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2016 17:56:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/what-is-the-most-stable-fmc-version/m-p/3538096#M155880</guid>
      <dc:creator>jaime.pedraza</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-09-21T17:56:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

