<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Bi-directional STATIC NAT? in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/bi-directional-static-nat/m-p/2876084#M156583</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;quick question - if i configured an object called AVobject (IP of host 192.168.4.2) to NAT to an outside IP address (i.e 50.50.50.50), do I need to create an additional outside rule to translate it back?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;(50.50.50.50, translated to 192.168.4.2). The scenario here is I have an AV object that needs to be translated to a WAN IP, any inbound traffic to the ASA to that WAN IP needs to be forwarded to that LAN IP.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;My upstream rule appears to work on packet tracer, however returning the traffic I am having an issue with it.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I have a permit any, AVobject, AVServiceGroup, permit. Is the issue that I am setting the destination as the AV object which is using an RFC address?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 07:59:01 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>nick.szilagyi</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-03-12T07:59:01Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Bi-directional STATIC NAT?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/bi-directional-static-nat/m-p/2876084#M156583</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;quick question - if i configured an object called AVobject (IP of host 192.168.4.2) to NAT to an outside IP address (i.e 50.50.50.50), do I need to create an additional outside rule to translate it back?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;(50.50.50.50, translated to 192.168.4.2). The scenario here is I have an AV object that needs to be translated to a WAN IP, any inbound traffic to the ASA to that WAN IP needs to be forwarded to that LAN IP.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;My upstream rule appears to work on packet tracer, however returning the traffic I am having an issue with it.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I have a permit any, AVobject, AVServiceGroup, permit. Is the issue that I am setting the destination as the AV object which is using an RFC address?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 07:59:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/bi-directional-static-nat/m-p/2876084#M156583</guid>
      <dc:creator>nick.szilagyi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-12T07:59:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>think ive just answered my</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/bi-directional-static-nat/m-p/2876085#M156584</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;think ive just answered my own question - I've just tested and appears to work by amending the ACL destination to the WAN IP instead of the internal object IP.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 03 Jul 2016 12:42:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/bi-directional-static-nat/m-p/2876085#M156584</guid>
      <dc:creator>nick.szilagyi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-07-03T12:42:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

