<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Thanks Karsten, in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/mix-of-contexts-transparent-and-routed/m-p/2935246#M156826</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks Karsten,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I'm reading the 9.0 configuration guide and come across the following&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;If only one context is associated with the ingress interface, the ASA classifies the packet into that context. In transparent firewall mode, unique interfaces for contexts are required, so this method is used to classify packets at all tim&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Does this imply that If use for example interface G1 and G2 in my transparent context, I cannot use these interfaces in my routed context? Or am I misunderstanding what it means by unique interfaces above?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2016 21:17:16 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>GRANT3779</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-08-03T21:17:16Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Mix of Contexts - Transparent and Routed</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/mix-of-contexts-transparent-and-routed/m-p/2935244#M156738</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi All,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I have been reading conflicting information.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The setup I want to have is as follows.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I will have 2 x 5516X (ASA1 and ASA2)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I want to have two contexts on each ASA - &amp;nbsp;CTX1 and CTX2.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;CTX1 - Transparent Mode&lt;BR /&gt;CTX2 - Routed Mode&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;ASA1 to be active for CTX1 and standby for CTX2&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;ASA2 to be active for CTX2 and standby for CTX1&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Now from reading multiple documents, can I actually have an ASA with two contexts, with one being routed and the other being transparent before I go any further?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 08:05:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/mix-of-contexts-transparent-and-routed/m-p/2935244#M156738</guid>
      <dc:creator>GRANT3779</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-12T08:05:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Mixed firewall mode was added</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/mix-of-contexts-transparent-and-routed/m-p/2935245#M156757</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Mixed firewall mode &lt;A href="http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/asa/roadmap/asa_new_features.html#ID-2986-00000080"&gt;was added in 9.0&lt;/A&gt;. So, go further with your deployment.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2016 16:57:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/mix-of-contexts-transparent-and-routed/m-p/2935245#M156757</guid>
      <dc:creator>Karsten Iwen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-08-03T16:57:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thanks Karsten,</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/mix-of-contexts-transparent-and-routed/m-p/2935246#M156826</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks Karsten,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I'm reading the 9.0 configuration guide and come across the following&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;If only one context is associated with the ingress interface, the ASA classifies the packet into that context. In transparent firewall mode, unique interfaces for contexts are required, so this method is used to classify packets at all tim&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Does this imply that If use for example interface G1 and G2 in my transparent context, I cannot use these interfaces in my routed context? Or am I misunderstanding what it means by unique interfaces above?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2016 21:17:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/mix-of-contexts-transparent-and-routed/m-p/2935246#M156826</guid>
      <dc:creator>GRANT3779</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-08-03T21:17:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Yes, you can't have shared</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/mix-of-contexts-transparent-and-routed/m-p/2935247#M156837</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes, you can't have shared interfaces in this case. But the unique interfaces don't have to be physical interfaces, you can use subinterfaces if you need many physical interfaces for other purposes.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2016 21:31:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/mix-of-contexts-transparent-and-routed/m-p/2935247#M156837</guid>
      <dc:creator>Karsten Iwen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-08-03T21:31:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

