<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Hi, in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/active-standby/m-p/2912107#M158014</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You need the standby command and related standby configurations on both ASAs. Remember a complete failure is the best failure you can experience because it's an obvious&amp;nbsp;outage; And you have proven this type of failure works. However, one of the worst failures is an interfaces failure and this is where the monitoring commands come into play.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Hope this helps&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Frank&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2016 13:12:30 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>fsebera</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-04-12T13:12:30Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Active/standby</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/active-standby/m-p/2912106#M158013</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I have configured Active/Standby on two 9.5 ASAs. Failover is working fine. &amp;nbsp;I have tested with powering off the active and its brings up the standby as active. These failover works without &amp;nbsp;'standby' command on the outside/inside interfaces.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;My question is, is it must to have standby &amp;nbsp;command configured for active/standby situation? Is it mainly for stateful configuration?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 07:36:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/active-standby/m-p/2912106#M158013</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anthonize Rajaratne</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-12T07:36:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hi,</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/active-standby/m-p/2912107#M158014</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You need the standby command and related standby configurations on both ASAs. Remember a complete failure is the best failure you can experience because it's an obvious&amp;nbsp;outage; And you have proven this type of failure works. However, one of the worst failures is an interfaces failure and this is where the monitoring commands come into play.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Hope this helps&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Frank&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2016 13:12:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/active-standby/m-p/2912107#M158014</guid>
      <dc:creator>fsebera</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-04-12T13:12:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thanks for your reply Frank.</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/active-standby/m-p/2912108#M158015</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your reply Frank.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I have tested interface failure as well by unplugging the cable and standby device took over. I'm not sure is it must command 'standby' needs to be configured unless you need stateful or &amp;nbsp;are you referring physical interface fail?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2016 13:47:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/active-standby/m-p/2912108#M158015</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anthonize Rajaratne</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-04-12T13:47:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Yes, each "active" interface</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/active-standby/m-p/2912109#M158016</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes, each &lt;SPAN style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;"&lt;STRONG&gt;active"&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt; interface may need to be monitored to avoid black-holing traffic.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2016 13:52:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/active-standby/m-p/2912109#M158016</guid>
      <dc:creator>fsebera</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-04-12T13:52:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

