<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic You may get the best results in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/upgrade-problem/m-p/2922765#M158967</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;You may get the best results from rewriting the config, but by all means try an automatic upgrade to see what happens.&amp;nbsp; The two biggest changes are:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;* at 8.3, they completely redid the way NAT works (new style has phase I "twice NAT" rules and phase II object NAT rules; the old global NAT stuff is gone)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;* at 9.0, they unified v4 and v6 access lists (the "any" keyword becomes dual-stack)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;-- Jim Leinweber, WI State Lab of Hygiene&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2016 22:30:22 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>James Leinweber</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-03-07T22:30:22Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Upgrade Problem</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/upgrade-problem/m-p/2922760#M158960</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I have a ASA 5510 with 8.0(5)31&amp;nbsp; and now i bougth a new ASA 5508 with 9.4(1).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Now i see that the config is not compatible. What can i do? Write a new config? Is there any tool to convert the NAT ?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 07:25:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/upgrade-problem/m-p/2922760#M158960</guid>
      <dc:creator>Raimund Schimanovits</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-12T07:25:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Is there a possibility of</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/upgrade-problem/m-p/2922761#M158962</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Is there a possibility of Upgrading the 5510 to 9.4(1)?&lt;BR /&gt;If so I'd do that, since the ASA should automatically convert the config.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Alternatively you could try downgrading the 5508 and then upgrading again?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Feb 2016 10:34:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/upgrade-problem/m-p/2922761#M158962</guid>
      <dc:creator>linus.laeubli</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-02-29T10:34:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>I bought a new because i need</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/upgrade-problem/m-p/2922762#M158964</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I bought a new because i need more ports so i did not want to upgrade the old one. Can i copy the old config to the new ASA and it would work without any problems? I read that there are a lot of changes in the NAT config.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Feb 2016 13:28:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/upgrade-problem/m-p/2922762#M158964</guid>
      <dc:creator>Raimund Schimanovits</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-02-29T13:28:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sorry if I didn't make myself</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/upgrade-problem/m-p/2922763#M158965</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Sorry if I didn't make myself clear:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;1. Upgrade the 5510 to 9.4(1) (have a look at upgrade path for that, don't direct upgrade)&lt;BR /&gt;2. Backup config, and everything else&lt;BR /&gt;3. Restore config on your new 5508&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;At least that is the only way I can think of right now&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Feb 2016 13:32:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/upgrade-problem/m-p/2922763#M158965</guid>
      <dc:creator>linus.laeubli</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-02-29T13:32:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ok. Thanks i will test it.</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/upgrade-problem/m-p/2922764#M158966</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Ok. Thanks i will test it.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Feb 2016 14:30:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/upgrade-problem/m-p/2922764#M158966</guid>
      <dc:creator>Raimund Schimanovits</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-02-29T14:30:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>You may get the best results</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/upgrade-problem/m-p/2922765#M158967</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You may get the best results from rewriting the config, but by all means try an automatic upgrade to see what happens.&amp;nbsp; The two biggest changes are:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;* at 8.3, they completely redid the way NAT works (new style has phase I "twice NAT" rules and phase II object NAT rules; the old global NAT stuff is gone)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;* at 9.0, they unified v4 and v6 access lists (the "any" keyword becomes dual-stack)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;-- Jim Leinweber, WI State Lab of Hygiene&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2016 22:30:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/upgrade-problem/m-p/2922765#M158967</guid>
      <dc:creator>James Leinweber</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-03-07T22:30:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

