<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic With version 9.5(2) does not in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa5506-pbr-with-two-isps/m-p/2810028#M164053</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;With version&amp;nbsp;9.5(2) does not work properly with PPPoE connections. &amp;nbsp;You will not get this to work. &amp;nbsp;The ASA fails to set the next hop correctly.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Perhaps the next software version.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2016 22:24:17 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Philip D'Ath</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-01-28T22:24:17Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ASA5506 PBR with two ISPs</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa5506-pbr-with-two-isps/m-p/2810027#M164052</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;since the asa supports pbr we want to use this feature to do some traffic shaping. We are running version 9.5(1) and have two ISP connections via PPPoE each ISP.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Is it possible to use pbr on the asa in this scenario?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We have done the setup with non dynamic ISP connections and we had not problems. But we can´t find a solution with dynamic pppoe setups.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;It looks like the learned default routes have to be local connected. But with PPPoE we are receiving default routes&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;logging:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;.....&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;pbr: First matching rule from ACL(4)&lt;BR /&gt;pbr: route map MET_PBR_RM_MET_LAN, sequence 10, permit; proceed with policy routing&lt;BR /&gt;pbr: evaluating recursive next-hop 217.0.118.45&lt;BR /&gt;pbr: no route to next-hop 217.0.118.45 found&lt;BR /&gt;pbr: policy based routing could not be applied; proceeding with normal route lookup&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;...&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;show asp table routing&lt;BR /&gt;route table timestamp: 591&lt;BR /&gt;in&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 identity&lt;BR /&gt;in&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 127.1.0.1&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 255.255.255.255 identity&lt;BR /&gt;in&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 217.237.188.89&amp;nbsp; 255.255.255.255 identity&lt;BR /&gt;in&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 192.168.10.1&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 255.255.255.255 identity&lt;BR /&gt;in&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 91.18.25.86&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 255.255.255.255 identity&lt;BR /&gt;in&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 217.237.188.80&amp;nbsp; 255.255.255.240 ISP_STATIC&lt;BR /&gt;in&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 192.168.10.0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 255.255.255.0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; LAN_MET&lt;BR /&gt;in&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0.0.0.0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0.0.0.0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; via x.x.x.x ISP_STATIC&lt;BR /&gt;out&amp;nbsp; 255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 LAN_MET&lt;BR /&gt;out&amp;nbsp; 192.168.10.1&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 255.255.255.255 LAN_MET&lt;BR /&gt;out&amp;nbsp; 192.168.10.0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 255.255.255.0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; LAN_MET&lt;BR /&gt;out&amp;nbsp; 224.0.0.0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 240.0.0.0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; LAN_MET&lt;BR /&gt;out&amp;nbsp; 255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 ISP_PPPoE&lt;BR /&gt;out&amp;nbsp; 224.0.0.0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 240.0.0.0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; ISP_PPPoE&lt;BR /&gt;out&amp;nbsp; 0.0.0.0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0.0.0.0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; via 217.0.118.45, ISP_PPPoE&lt;BR /&gt;out&amp;nbsp; 255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 ISP_STATIC&lt;BR /&gt;out&amp;nbsp; 217.237.188.89&amp;nbsp; 255.255.255.255 ISP_STATIC&lt;BR /&gt;out&amp;nbsp; 217.237.188.80&amp;nbsp; 255.255.255.240 ISP_STATIC&lt;BR /&gt;out&amp;nbsp; 224.0.0.0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 240.0.0.0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; ISP_STATIC&lt;BR /&gt;out&amp;nbsp; 0.0.0.0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0.0.0.0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; via 217.237.188.81, ISP_STATIC&lt;BR /&gt;out&amp;nbsp; 255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 _internal_loopback&lt;BR /&gt;out&amp;nbsp; 224.0.0.0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 240.0.0.0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; _internal_loopback&lt;BR /&gt;out&amp;nbsp; 0.0.0.0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0.0.0.0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; via 0.0.0.0, identity&lt;BR /&gt;out&amp;nbsp; ::&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; ::&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; via 0.0.0.0, identity&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;route-map MET_PBR_RM_MET_LAN permit 10&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;match ip address PBR_ACL_MET_SRV_SMTP&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;set ip next-hop recursive 217.0.118.45&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;interface GigabitEthernet1/8&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;nameif LAN_MET&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;security-level 100&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;ip address 192.168.10.1 255.255.255.0&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;policy-route route-map MET_PBR_RM_MET_LAN&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Any ideas?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 07:12:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa5506-pbr-with-two-isps/m-p/2810027#M164052</guid>
      <dc:creator>escswosp</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-12T07:12:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>With version 9.5(2) does not</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa5506-pbr-with-two-isps/m-p/2810028#M164053</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;With version&amp;nbsp;9.5(2) does not work properly with PPPoE connections. &amp;nbsp;You will not get this to work. &amp;nbsp;The ASA fails to set the next hop correctly.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Perhaps the next software version.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2016 22:24:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa5506-pbr-with-two-isps/m-p/2810028#M164053</guid>
      <dc:creator>Philip D'Ath</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-01-28T22:24:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hello, does it work with</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa5506-pbr-with-two-isps/m-p/2810029#M164054</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello, does it work with version 9.5(3)?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2017 17:39:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa5506-pbr-with-two-isps/m-p/2810029#M164054</guid>
      <dc:creator>schuetzm</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-01-11T17:39:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

