<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Philip, in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/different-interfaces-with-ip-in-the-same-subnet/m-p/2862664#M166959</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Philip,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;thanks for your support&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In the Linux firewall there are a lot of NAT to each link, if I install all links in the switch, I have to do NAT twice, right?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Or do you think is better do the NAT on the L3 switch and in the ASA only controll the access?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2016 14:46:25 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>marcio.tormente</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-06-17T14:46:25Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Different interfaces with IP in the same subnet</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/different-interfaces-with-ip-in-the-same-subnet/m-p/2862662#M166957</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello Folks!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I have to migrate the configuration of Linux firewall to ASA 5516, but I have a problem:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;My customer have 3 different links with the same ISP with the same subnet, example:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Link 4MB IP 201.1.1.1/24&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Link 15MB IP 201.1.1.3/24&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Link 10MB IP 201.1.1.10/24&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;When I try to configure it on ASA, I have the problema with overlap.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Anyone knows how to solve this problem?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Marcio&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 07:54:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/different-interfaces-with-ip-in-the-same-subnet/m-p/2862662#M166957</guid>
      <dc:creator>marcio.tormente</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-12T07:54:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>And it should not work.  The</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/different-interfaces-with-ip-in-the-same-subnet/m-p/2862663#M166958</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;And it should not work. &amp;nbsp;The is not a valid IP addressing scheme. &amp;nbsp;You need to fix the fundamental IP address issue first.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You could potentially plug all three circuits into a switch, and then into the outside interface of the ASA. &amp;nbsp;Configure it with one of those IP addresses, and then NAT the other two to where ever you want them to go to.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2016 22:25:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/different-interfaces-with-ip-in-the-same-subnet/m-p/2862663#M166958</guid>
      <dc:creator>Philip D'Ath</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-16T22:25:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Philip,</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/different-interfaces-with-ip-in-the-same-subnet/m-p/2862664#M166959</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Philip,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;thanks for your support&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In the Linux firewall there are a lot of NAT to each link, if I install all links in the switch, I have to do NAT twice, right?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Or do you think is better do the NAT on the L3 switch and in the ASA only controll the access?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2016 14:46:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/different-interfaces-with-ip-in-the-same-subnet/m-p/2862664#M166959</guid>
      <dc:creator>marcio.tormente</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-17T14:46:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>No, there would be no need</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/different-interfaces-with-ip-in-the-same-subnet/m-p/2862665#M166960</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;No, there would be no need for double NAT.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;L3 switches typically do not do NAT.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2016 04:46:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/different-interfaces-with-ip-in-the-same-subnet/m-p/2862665#M166960</guid>
      <dc:creator>Philip D'Ath</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-18T04:46:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>I know some switches have</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/different-interfaces-with-ip-in-the-same-subnet/m-p/2862666#M166961</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I know some switches have some limitations, but in this case, the switch is not Cisco, then, my customer will be responsable to all configuration.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;He give me the sugestion to use proxy-arp and NAT to solve this problem.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;To be honest, I don´t know nothing about proxy-arp.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2016 14:17:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/different-interfaces-with-ip-in-the-same-subnet/m-p/2862666#M166961</guid>
      <dc:creator>marcio.tormente</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-24T14:17:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>You might look into the 9.6</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/different-interfaces-with-ip-in-the-same-subnet/m-p/2862667#M166962</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You might look into the 9.6 series "zone" support, which is the first time we've seen ASA cope with multiple uplinks gracefully.&amp;nbsp; It's been a historical pain point.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2016 16:54:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/different-interfaces-with-ip-in-the-same-subnet/m-p/2862667#M166962</guid>
      <dc:creator>James Leinweber</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-27T16:54:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thanks James,</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/different-interfaces-with-ip-in-the-same-subnet/m-p/2862668#M166963</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks James,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I´ve been talk to others experts in ASA, and none of then knows another way to do it, only with NAT 1:1 or dynamic PAT.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2016 17:07:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/different-interfaces-with-ip-in-the-same-subnet/m-p/2862668#M166963</guid>
      <dc:creator>marcio.tormente</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-27T17:07:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

