<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Thanks everyone!  in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/high-availability-question/m-p/2880225#M171677</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks everyone!&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;And thank you for the pointer Marvin. I thought I had read that somewhere, but I couldn't find it again.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2016 11:52:30 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>james.silvius</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-04-21T11:52:30Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>High Availability question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/high-availability-question/m-p/2880221#M171668</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We are currently looking to buy new ASA 5515-X boxes for our facilities.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Can you configure high availability between the 5515-X and a 5510, or do they have to be like devices?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I've googled and searched the support forum, but I haven't been able to find an answer.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 07:38:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/high-availability-question/m-p/2880221#M171668</guid>
      <dc:creator>james.silvius</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-12T07:38:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Don't buy a 5515-X.  It was</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/high-availability-question/m-p/2880222#M171671</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Don't buy a 5515-X. &amp;nbsp;It was replaced by a 5516-X. &amp;nbsp;Same price. &amp;nbsp;Much much faster, and has improved Firepower support (if you want that).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;No, you can not do HA between a 5515/5516 and a 5510. &amp;nbsp;The models (and in most but not all cases the licences also) must be exactly the same.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2016 20:44:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/high-availability-question/m-p/2880222#M171671</guid>
      <dc:creator>Philip D'Ath</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-04-20T20:44:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>I would agree with what</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/high-availability-question/m-p/2880223#M171672</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I would agree with what Philip said, the 5516 is a much better choice.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2016 23:22:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/high-availability-question/m-p/2880223#M171672</guid>
      <dc:creator>nspasov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-04-20T23:22:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>For your goole reference,</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/high-availability-question/m-p/2880224#M171675</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;For your google reference, here is the citation re failover requirements:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/asa/asa96/configuration/general/asa-96-general-config/ha-failover.html#ID-2107-0000001c&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The two units in a &lt;SPAN&gt;Failover&lt;/SPAN&gt; configuration must:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;A name="ID-2107-0000001c__li_D9E7D4755B2E4F86B770EC79D0B833C9"&gt;&lt;/A&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A name="ID-2107-0000001c__ID-2107-0000001e"&gt;&lt;/A&gt;Be the same model.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;A name="ID-2107-0000001c__li_F43CED85CE5344D087AE0259D0E9BC62"&gt;&lt;/A&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A name="ID-2107-0000001c__ID-2107-00000020"&gt;&lt;/A&gt;Have the same number and types of interfaces.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;A name="ID-2107-0000001c__li_78BCDBBB039740E38B667EA03E1D8890"&gt;&lt;/A&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A name="ID-2107-0000001c__ID-2107-00000022"&gt;&lt;/A&gt;Have the same modules installed (if any)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;A name="ID-2107-0000001c__li_E4633E72924F4B9DB3282F9CDE975215"&gt;&lt;/A&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A name="ID-2107-0000001c__ID-2107-00000024"&gt;&lt;/A&gt;Have the same RAM installed.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2016 03:30:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/high-availability-question/m-p/2880224#M171675</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marvin Rhoads</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-04-21T03:30:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thanks everyone! </title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/high-availability-question/m-p/2880225#M171677</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks everyone!&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;And thank you for the pointer Marvin. I thought I had read that somewhere, but I couldn't find it again.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2016 11:52:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/high-availability-question/m-p/2880225#M171677</guid>
      <dc:creator>james.silvius</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-04-21T11:52:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

