<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic hello Philip  in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-question/m-p/2903289#M171850</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;hello Philip&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Thank you for your answer, your description is right, and the client is through the DNS analysis to get the server address, the client only know 9.0.0.0/8 this paragraph of routing, there is a solution to it?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2016 10:05:20 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>zhushaogang</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-03-10T10:05:20Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>nat question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-question/m-p/2903287#M171847</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello，Everyone&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; I have a question, I hope to get help, As shown in Figure requirements, how to achieve？thank you!&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://community.cisco.com/legacyfs/online/media/qqtu_pian_20160310105434_0.png" class="migrated-markup-image" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 07:27:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-question/m-p/2903287#M171847</guid>
      <dc:creator>zhushaogang</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-12T07:27:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>So if the client accesses a 9</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-question/m-p/2903288#M171848</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;So if the client accesses a 9.0.0.0/8 address you want there source addresses NATed to 2.0.0.0/8.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;And is 9.0.0.0/8 being NATed into the 200.0.0/24, 201.0.0/24, etc server addresses?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2016 09:20:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-question/m-p/2903288#M171848</guid>
      <dc:creator>Philip D'Ath</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-03-10T09:20:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>hello Philip </title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-question/m-p/2903289#M171850</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;hello Philip&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Thank you for your answer, your description is right, and the client is through the DNS analysis to get the server address, the client only know 9.0.0.0/8 this paragraph of routing, there is a solution to it?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2016 10:05:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-question/m-p/2903289#M171850</guid>
      <dc:creator>zhushaogang</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-03-10T10:05:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Yes, but it is painful.</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-question/m-p/2903290#M171852</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes, but it is painful. &amp;nbsp;Check out this guide.,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/asa/asa84/asdm64/configuration_guide/asdm_64_config/nat_rules.html"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/asa/asa84/asdm64/configuration_guide/asdm_64_config/nat_rules.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2016 01:55:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-question/m-p/2903290#M171852</guid>
      <dc:creator>Philip D'Ath</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-03-11T01:55:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>OK,Philip D'Ath,thank you</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-question/m-p/2903291#M171854</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;OK,&lt;A href="https://supportforums.cisco.com/users/pdath" title="View user profile." class="username" lang="" about="/users/pdath" typeof="sioc:UserAccount" property="foaf:name" datatype=""&gt;Philip D'Ath&lt;/A&gt;,thank you very much&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2016 07:00:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-question/m-p/2903291#M171854</guid>
      <dc:creator>zhushaogang</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-03-11T07:00:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hi,Philip ,the Add NAT Rule</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-question/m-p/2903292#M171855</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,Philip ,the Add NAT Rule dialog box,check the '&lt;STRONG&gt;Translate DNS replies that match this rule&lt;/STRONG&gt;' check box,through 8.8.8.8 analysis, DNS A records rewritten as 9.0.0.0/24,yes or not? if not ,how to get? thank you.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;but ,Its explanation is that，&lt;STRONG&gt;(For a source-only rule) Translate DNS replies that match this rule&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2016 11:24:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-question/m-p/2903292#M171855</guid>
      <dc:creator>zhushaogang</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-03-16T11:24:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>You know, I have never used</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-question/m-p/2903293#M171856</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You know, I have never used that option, so I'm not sure if it will accomplish what you want or not.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2016 21:14:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-question/m-p/2903293#M171856</guid>
      <dc:creator>Philip D'Ath</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-03-16T21:14:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

