<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Cisco ASA 5510 and Multiple Outside Interfaces Problem in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cisco-asa-5510-and-multiple-outside-interfaces-problem/m-p/2805103#M173235</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;We have an Cisco ASA 5510 firewall.&amp;nbsp; There are 4 ports on it configured as 2 outside, &lt;SPAN&gt;and 2&lt;/SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;inside.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We have two cable modems attached to the outside ports.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Our plan is to have the "inside1" port directed to one outside port/cable modem,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;and the "&lt;SPAN&gt;inside2"&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;port directed to the other outside port/cable modem.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We have been able to get the "inside1-to-outside1" setup to work but not the &lt;SPAN&gt;"inside2-to-outside2" &lt;/SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;setup (at least at the same time).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;First off, is this possible?&amp;nbsp; If so, what are we likely missing - some way to have a second default route for the &lt;SPAN&gt;outside2&lt;/SPAN&gt;?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 07:09:48 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>amorguettat</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-03-12T07:09:48Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Cisco ASA 5510 and Multiple Outside Interfaces Problem</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cisco-asa-5510-and-multiple-outside-interfaces-problem/m-p/2805103#M173235</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We have an Cisco ASA 5510 firewall.&amp;nbsp; There are 4 ports on it configured as 2 outside, &lt;SPAN&gt;and 2&lt;/SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;inside.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We have two cable modems attached to the outside ports.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Our plan is to have the "inside1" port directed to one outside port/cable modem,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;and the "&lt;SPAN&gt;inside2"&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;port directed to the other outside port/cable modem.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We have been able to get the "inside1-to-outside1" setup to work but not the &lt;SPAN&gt;"inside2-to-outside2" &lt;/SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;setup (at least at the same time).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;First off, is this possible?&amp;nbsp; If so, what are we likely missing - some way to have a second default route for the &lt;SPAN&gt;outside2&lt;/SPAN&gt;?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 07:09:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cisco-asa-5510-and-multiple-outside-interfaces-problem/m-p/2805103#M173235</guid>
      <dc:creator>amorguettat</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-12T07:09:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>For this scenario to work you</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cisco-asa-5510-and-multiple-outside-interfaces-problem/m-p/2805104#M173236</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;For this scenario to work you need Policy-Based Routing (PBR) which was introduced in ASA release 9.4(1) and&amp;nbsp;is only available for ASA-X platforms.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2016 13:37:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cisco-asa-5510-and-multiple-outside-interfaces-problem/m-p/2805104#M173236</guid>
      <dc:creator>Karsten Iwen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-01-19T13:37:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Does the firewall asa 5510</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cisco-asa-5510-and-multiple-outside-interfaces-problem/m-p/2805105#M173237</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Does the firewall asa 5510 support the "ASA release 9.4(1)" ?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;How can I&amp;nbsp; downolad the "&lt;SPAN&gt;ASA release 9.4(1)" ?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2016 14:59:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cisco-asa-5510-and-multiple-outside-interfaces-problem/m-p/2805105#M173237</guid>
      <dc:creator>amorguettat</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-01-19T14:59:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>No, the legacy (EOL announced</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cisco-asa-5510-and-multiple-outside-interfaces-problem/m-p/2805106#M173238</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;No, the legacy (EOL announced) ASAs (without -X in the name)&amp;nbsp;don't run the newer software. If you really need that feature it's time for a new firewall.&amp;nbsp;If the 5510 is fine from the&amp;nbsp;performance, then a replacement-product could be the 5508-X. If you need some more power, the 5516-X is for you:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/security/asa-5500-series-next-generation-firewalls/datasheet-c78-733916.html"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/security/asa-5500-series-next-generation-firewalls/datasheet-c78-733916.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2016 15:44:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cisco-asa-5510-and-multiple-outside-interfaces-problem/m-p/2805106#M173238</guid>
      <dc:creator>Karsten Iwen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-01-19T15:44:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>You can use Cisco ASA 5515-X</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cisco-asa-5510-and-multiple-outside-interfaces-problem/m-p/2805107#M173239</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We can use Cisco ASA 5515-X ???&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2016 11:24:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cisco-asa-5510-and-multiple-outside-interfaces-problem/m-p/2805107#M173239</guid>
      <dc:creator>amorguettat</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-01-27T11:24:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Yes, that's also an -X model.</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cisco-asa-5510-and-multiple-outside-interfaces-problem/m-p/2805108#M173240</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes, that's also an -X model.&amp;nbsp;I wouldn't recommend the 5515-X nowadays. The 5516-X is only slightly more expensive, and gives you more power. If you don't need the power of the 5516-X, then the 5508-X&amp;nbsp;is a good buy.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;But still, the 5515-X&amp;nbsp;can do that.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2016 11:30:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cisco-asa-5510-and-multiple-outside-interfaces-problem/m-p/2805108#M173240</guid>
      <dc:creator>Karsten Iwen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-01-27T11:30:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

