<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Hi Karsten, in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firewall-with-firewall-connectivity/m-p/2785091#M173351</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Karsten,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;What do you mean by "some form" here. If this means with one to one direct physical connectivity then it's Ok. But if FWs are connected to each other through switches.....then&amp;nbsp;question is still not picked up properly&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2016 19:50:32 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>netbeginner</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-01-18T19:50:32Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Firewall With Firewall Connectivity</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firewall-with-firewall-connectivity/m-p/2785089#M173349</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello Experts,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Would like to know, Why this is not advisable to connect Firewall with other Firewall directly for data communication,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Rgds&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 07:08:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firewall-with-firewall-connectivity/m-p/2785089#M173349</guid>
      <dc:creator>netbeginner</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-12T07:08:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Who states that? In high</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firewall-with-firewall-connectivity/m-p/2785090#M173350</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Who states that? In&amp;nbsp;high-security environments, you often find multiple layers of firewalls which are in some form directly connected.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2016 17:25:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firewall-with-firewall-connectivity/m-p/2785090#M173350</guid>
      <dc:creator>Karsten Iwen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-01-14T17:25:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hi Karsten,</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firewall-with-firewall-connectivity/m-p/2785091#M173351</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Karsten,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;What do you mean by "some form" here. If this means with one to one direct physical connectivity then it's Ok. But if FWs are connected to each other through switches.....then&amp;nbsp;question is still not picked up properly&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2016 19:50:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firewall-with-firewall-connectivity/m-p/2785091#M173351</guid>
      <dc:creator>netbeginner</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-01-18T19:50:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>It's not clear exactly what</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firewall-with-firewall-connectivity/m-p/2785092#M173352</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It's not clear exactly what the question is.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;With multiple firewalls there are a number of ways of connecting the DMZs ie. to the front end only, the back end only or to both firewalls so it's difficult to answer your question.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Can you perhaps give a few more details ?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Jon&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2016 20:39:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firewall-with-firewall-connectivity/m-p/2785092#M173352</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jon Marshall</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-01-18T20:39:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Typically there are switches</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firewall-with-firewall-connectivity/m-p/2785093#M173353</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Typically there are switches between them. Without it's harder (but not impossible)&amp;nbsp;to achieve high-availability for the firewall environment. So still, it's not uncommon and I still have no idea where you got&amp;nbsp;this information.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2016 20:43:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firewall-with-firewall-connectivity/m-p/2785093#M173353</guid>
      <dc:creator>Karsten Iwen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-01-18T20:43:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

