<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic ASA Redundant Interfaces in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-redundant-interfaces/m-p/2789832#M174392</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi All&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I have a Cisco ASA 5550 that already has 4 physical interfaces used which includes the use of 8 redundant interfaces under redudant1.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I am planning on using some of the spare physical interfaces shortly but wanted to use redundant interfaces also.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I've read on the Cisco pages that the ASA can only have a maximum of 8 redundant interfaces.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;My question is on my ASA can I create another Redundant Interface2 and have another 8 spare redundant interfaces to use ? or does it mean that because the ASA already has 8 Redundant interfaces set up that I cannot do this ?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;thanks&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 06:58:38 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jim Kerr</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-03-12T06:58:38Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ASA Redundant Interfaces</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-redundant-interfaces/m-p/2789832#M174392</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi All&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I have a Cisco ASA 5550 that already has 4 physical interfaces used which includes the use of 8 redundant interfaces under redudant1.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I am planning on using some of the spare physical interfaces shortly but wanted to use redundant interfaces also.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I've read on the Cisco pages that the ASA can only have a maximum of 8 redundant interfaces.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;My question is on my ASA can I create another Redundant Interface2 and have another 8 spare redundant interfaces to use ? or does it mean that because the ASA already has 8 Redundant interfaces set up that I cannot do this ?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;thanks&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 06:58:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-redundant-interfaces/m-p/2789832#M174392</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jim Kerr</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-12T06:58:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>I don't really understand</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-redundant-interfaces/m-p/2789833#M174393</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I don't really understand what you are having at the moment as for example a redundant interface can't have eight members.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This is how it works:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;You can have up to eight logical redundant interfaces. These interfaces hold your nameif, sec-level and ip-address.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Each logical redundant interface has two physical member-interfaces. These member interfaces are exclusivly bound to the logical redundant interface that uses them.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;With an 5550 you can have a maximum of four redundant interfaces with two member interafces each. All eight interfaces of the 5550 are used that way.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;If you connect these interfaces to you own infrastructure,&amp;nbsp;using Etherchannel interfaces instead of redundant interfaces could be a better solution.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2015 13:55:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-redundant-interfaces/m-p/2789833#M174393</guid>
      <dc:creator>Karsten Iwen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-12-02T13:55:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

