<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Fibre interface connection fails on primary FTD after adding to HA pair in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fibre-interface-connection-fails-on-primary-ftd-after-adding-to/m-p/3882284#M17627</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;What does the current output from "show failover" indicate?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2019 05:49:27 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Marvin Rhoads</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-07-01T05:49:27Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Fibre interface connection fails on primary FTD after adding to HA pair</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fibre-interface-connection-fails-on-primary-ftd-after-adding-to/m-p/3882261#M17626</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Recently, we did a firewall change, which involved changing the connection on one of the interfaces (Guest) of the primary FTD (part of HA pair), from copper to fibre. The change was not successful. I have provided details below.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Prior to the change&lt;/STRONG&gt; –&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;The secondary ftd was already in a failed state as its Guest interface connection was already using fibre connection, while the primary was on copper.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Due to this different interface type, the pair was not in HA and traffic was passing only through primary FTD.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;During this time, the primary FTD was carrying production traffic.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;During the change&lt;/STRONG&gt; –&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;the HA pair had purposefully been broken down.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Connection on guest service interface of primary ftd was changed from copper to fibre.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;firewall was successfully passing traffic.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;As soon as, the FTD was added to HA, it went to failed state. The failover reason on&amp;nbsp; the primary FTD was “no guest link”, even though physically it was connected. The interface status it was showing as down.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;To isolate the issue on the primary, we made the secondary ftd as active firewall and vice versa.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Post the change – &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;the secondary firewall is currently passing production traffic, while the standby primary is in failed state.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can anyone please advise what could have been the probable cause or how it can be fixed ? Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 17:15:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fibre-interface-connection-fails-on-primary-ftd-after-adding-to/m-p/3882261#M17626</guid>
      <dc:creator>damode</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T17:15:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fibre interface connection fails on primary FTD after adding to HA pair</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fibre-interface-connection-fails-on-primary-ftd-after-adding-to/m-p/3882284#M17627</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;What does the current output from "show failover" indicate?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2019 05:49:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fibre-interface-connection-fails-on-primary-ftd-after-adding-to/m-p/3882284#M17627</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marvin Rhoads</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-01T05:49:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

