<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Hi, in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/passing-traffic-across-interfaces-with-same-security-levels/m-p/2750735#M177807</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;From the configuration it looks like 'nat-control's is enabled and it is dropping as there is no nat for the traffic.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I could see that you have configured nat-exemption for inside network. Please use the below command :&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;PRE&gt;
access-list inside_nat0_outbound line 1 extended permit ip 192.168.153.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.169.0 255.255.0.0 &lt;/PRE&gt;

&lt;P&gt;It should work.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Rate if it helps!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Akshay Rastogi&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2015 20:03:30 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Akshay Rastogi</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-10-12T20:03:30Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Passing traffic across interfaces with same security levels.</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/passing-traffic-across-interfaces-with-same-security-levels/m-p/2750734#M177806</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am trying to pass traffic across 2 interfaces with the same security levels and I can't seem to get it to work past the Firewall its self. I can ping across the firewall to the other network, but I can't get this to function from a network PC. I am running and ASA 5505, and I have enter the same-security commands as well.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any help would be appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 06:44:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/passing-traffic-across-interfaces-with-same-security-levels/m-p/2750734#M177806</guid>
      <dc:creator>ddevecka</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-12T06:44:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hi,</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/passing-traffic-across-interfaces-with-same-security-levels/m-p/2750735#M177807</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;From the configuration it looks like 'nat-control's is enabled and it is dropping as there is no nat for the traffic.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I could see that you have configured nat-exemption for inside network. Please use the below command :&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;PRE&gt;
access-list inside_nat0_outbound line 1 extended permit ip 192.168.153.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.169.0 255.255.0.0 &lt;/PRE&gt;

&lt;P&gt;It should work.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Rate if it helps!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Akshay Rastogi&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2015 20:03:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/passing-traffic-across-interfaces-with-same-security-levels/m-p/2750735#M177807</guid>
      <dc:creator>Akshay Rastogi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-10-12T20:03:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Tried that and it didn't work</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/passing-traffic-across-interfaces-with-same-security-levels/m-p/2750736#M177808</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Tried that and it didn't work.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2015 19:05:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/passing-traffic-across-interfaces-with-same-security-levels/m-p/2750736#M177808</guid>
      <dc:creator>ddevecka</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-10-14T19:05:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hi,Please provide the output</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/passing-traffic-across-interfaces-with-same-security-levels/m-p/2750737#M177809</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please provide the output of :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;packet-tracer input inside tcp 192.168.153.x 12345 192.168.169.x 12345 det&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;packet-tracer input inside1 tcp 192.168.169.x 23343 192.168.153.x 22212 det&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Akshay Rastogi&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2015 19:48:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/passing-traffic-across-interfaces-with-same-security-levels/m-p/2750737#M177809</guid>
      <dc:creator>Akshay Rastogi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-10-14T19:48:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hi,Could you also provide the</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/passing-traffic-across-interfaces-with-same-security-levels/m-p/2750738#M177810</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Could you also provide the output from these commands:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;cap cap_probe type asp-drop all&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;cap cap_inside match ip host 192.168.153.x host 192.168.169.x&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;cap cap_inside1 match ip host 192.168.169.x&amp;nbsp; host 192.168.153.x&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And try to enable icmp inspection&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;policy-map global_policy&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;class inspection_default&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; inspect icmp&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ergin&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2015 12:43:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/passing-traffic-across-interfaces-with-same-security-levels/m-p/2750738#M177810</guid>
      <dc:creator>ealiev</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-10-15T12:43:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Here are the results.</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/passing-traffic-across-interfaces-with-same-security-levels/m-p/2750739#M177811</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Here are the results.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2015 19:33:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/passing-traffic-across-interfaces-with-same-security-levels/m-p/2750739#M177811</guid>
      <dc:creator>ddevecka</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-10-15T19:33:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hi,Are these packet-tracer</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/passing-traffic-across-interfaces-with-same-security-levels/m-p/2750740#M177812</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are these packet-tracer output taken after the access-list i asked to add?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also, i could see that you ran packet-tracer for destination 192.168.168.x. I believe your concerned traffic was '192.168.169.x' ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It says it is dropped at Access-list level. For testing purpose please add 'permit ip any any' on both the interfaces (153 and 169)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Akshay Rastogi&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2015 20:00:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/passing-traffic-across-interfaces-with-same-security-levels/m-p/2750740#M177812</guid>
      <dc:creator>Akshay Rastogi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-10-15T20:00:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Yes they are. I re-ran them</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/passing-traffic-across-interfaces-with-same-security-levels/m-p/2750741#M177813</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes they are. I re-ran them just to be safe.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2015 20:24:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/passing-traffic-across-interfaces-with-same-security-levels/m-p/2750741#M177813</guid>
      <dc:creator>ddevecka</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-10-15T20:24:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

