https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/using-addrgroups-in-reflexive-acls/m-p/2724107#M179330 <P>From discussions with Cisco specialists, it appeared that object groups and reflexive lists are developed&nbsp;as two different features and they can't be used in the same rule.&nbsp;</P> Sat, 09 Jan 2016 09:37:23 GMT Konstantin Kabassanov 2016-01-09T09:37:23Z https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/using-addrgroups-in-reflexive-acls/m-p/2724106#M179329 <P>Hello,</P><P>&nbsp;</P><P>I'm trying to find some information about simultaneous use of addrgroup (or portgroup) and reflexive statements in the same ACL entry.&nbsp;ACL parser on my 6506E with Sup2T doesn't allow me to do this, so I wonder if there is a way to do this or not.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</P><P>&nbsp;</P><P>Thanks.</P> Tue, 12 Mar 2019 06:33:16 GMT https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/using-addrgroups-in-reflexive-acls/m-p/2724106#M179329 Konstantin Kabassanov 2019-03-12T06:33:16Z https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/using-addrgroups-in-reflexive-acls/m-p/2724107#M179330 <P>From discussions with Cisco specialists, it appeared that object groups and reflexive lists are developed&nbsp;as two different features and they can't be used in the same rule.&nbsp;</P> Sat, 09 Jan 2016 09:37:23 GMT https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/using-addrgroups-in-reflexive-acls/m-p/2724107#M179330 Konstantin Kabassanov 2016-01-09T09:37:23Z