<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Did you set the ACL on the in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-configuring-the-management-interface/m-p/2693336#M191522</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Did you set the ACL on the IPS-module to allow the remote-server to connect?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2015 11:17:39 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Karsten Iwen</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-05-15T11:17:39Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ASA - Configuring The Management Interface</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-configuring-the-management-interface/m-p/2693331#M191517</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm having problems configuring the management/inside interface for management access,hoping someone can take a look and spot what it is i'm missing:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Inside &amp;amp; management interface connect to a layer 3 switch in vlan 31 which trunks to the core on 10.31.254.252 vlan 31.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Current config:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;gi0/1.31&lt;BR /&gt;ip address 10.31.250.10 255.255.0.0&lt;BR /&gt;nameif inside-core&lt;BR /&gt;vlan 31&lt;BR /&gt;security-level 100&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;m0/0&lt;BR /&gt;management-only&lt;BR /&gt;no ip address&lt;BR /&gt;no nameif&lt;BR /&gt;security-level 100&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ips module:&lt;BR /&gt;10.31.250.12 255.255.0.0 10.31.250.10&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;remote server:&lt;BR /&gt;10.30.181.1 255.255.0.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-lists are allowing anything, no nat.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think the issue relates to the two switchports that the interfaces are connected to, it seems to me that when they are in the same vlan, the module ignores the default gateway and exits through the management interface, when they aren't in the same vlan it just doesn't work.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 05:56:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-configuring-the-management-interface/m-p/2693331#M191517</guid>
      <dc:creator>petenixon</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-12T05:56:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The IPS-module and the ASA</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-configuring-the-management-interface/m-p/2693332#M191518</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The IPS-module and the ASA share a physical management-interface but have different management-settings.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you want to have your IPS-module in the inside-network of the ASA, then the IP in your example is ok, but the default-gateway of the module has to be the IP of the L3-switch in VLAN 31 (10.31.254.252). Your ASA won't be able to route the traffic back without dirty tricks.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2015 21:23:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-configuring-the-management-interface/m-p/2693332#M191518</guid>
      <dc:creator>Karsten Iwen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-05-14T21:23:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thanks for the reply Karsten</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-configuring-the-management-interface/m-p/2693333#M191519</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the reply Karsten.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The solution I have in my mind would be to add another inside network and nat the management traffic on to that subnet, which would (i think) solve my problem...&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2015 09:02:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-configuring-the-management-interface/m-p/2693333#M191519</guid>
      <dc:creator>petenixon</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-05-15T09:02:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Seems unnecessary complex to</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-configuring-the-management-interface/m-p/2693334#M191520</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Seems unnecessary complex to use an additional interface and NAT. Why do you think that the regular way won't work?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2015 09:29:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-configuring-the-management-interface/m-p/2693334#M191520</guid>
      <dc:creator>Karsten Iwen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-05-15T09:29:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>It hasn't previously! :)I</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-configuring-the-management-interface/m-p/2693335#M191521</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It hasn't previously! &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have previously had the default gateway set as the Layer 3 device as you suggested, but I wasn't able to connect to the ips module from the remote server.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've convinced myself that the problem lies with the ASA config, but maybe I should spend more time looking at either the server or other areas of the network and keep the config as above (changing the default gateway of the IPS)?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2015 10:03:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-configuring-the-management-interface/m-p/2693335#M191521</guid>
      <dc:creator>petenixon</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-05-15T10:03:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Did you set the ACL on the</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-configuring-the-management-interface/m-p/2693336#M191522</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Did you set the ACL on the IPS-module to allow the remote-server to connect?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2015 11:17:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-configuring-the-management-interface/m-p/2693336#M191522</guid>
      <dc:creator>Karsten Iwen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-05-15T11:17:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hi Karsten,Thanks again for</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-configuring-the-management-interface/m-p/2693337#M191523</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Karsten,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks again for coming back to me, it is very much appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The IPS module is a sourcefire module and doesn't have any ACL config (as far as I can tell).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The full config I am working with at the moment is:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;interface GigabitEthernet0/1.31&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;vlan 31&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;nameif inside&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;security-level 100&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;ip address 10.31.250.10 255.255.0.0&lt;BR /&gt;!&lt;BR /&gt;interface Management0/0&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;management-only&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;no nameif&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;no security-level&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;no ip address&lt;BR /&gt;!&lt;BR /&gt;same-security-traffic permit inter-interface&lt;BR /&gt;same-security-traffic permit intra-interface&lt;BR /&gt;!&lt;BR /&gt;object network SFR2&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;host 10.31.250.12&lt;BR /&gt;object network SFR-SERVER&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;host 10.30.181.1&lt;BR /&gt;object service SFR-MGMT&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;service tcp destination eq 8305&lt;BR /&gt;object service SFR-HI-PORTS&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;service tcp source eq 8305 destination range 1 65535&lt;BR /&gt;!&lt;BR /&gt;object-group service SFR-HIGH-PORTS&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;service-object object SFR-HI-PORTS&lt;BR /&gt;access-list global_access extended permit ip any any&lt;BR /&gt;access-list inside-core_access_in extended permit ip object SFR2 object SFR-SERVER&lt;BR /&gt;access-list inside-core_access_in extended permit ip object SFR-SERVER object SFR2&lt;BR /&gt;access-list inside-core_access_in extended permit udp object SFR2 any eq ntp&lt;BR /&gt;access-list inside-core_access_in extended permit udp any object SFR2 eq ntp&lt;BR /&gt;access-list inside-core_access_in extended permit object-group SFR-HIGH-PORTS object SFR2 object SFR-SERVER&lt;BR /&gt;access-list global_access_1 extended permit ip object SFR2 any&lt;BR /&gt;!&lt;BR /&gt;access-group inside-core_access_in in interface inside&lt;BR /&gt;access-group global_access_1 global&lt;BR /&gt;!&lt;BR /&gt;http server enable&lt;BR /&gt;http 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 inside&lt;BR /&gt;sysopt connection timewait&lt;BR /&gt;!&lt;BR /&gt;threat-detection basic-threat&lt;BR /&gt;threat-detection statistics access-list&lt;BR /&gt;no threat-detection statistics tcp-intercept&lt;BR /&gt;!&lt;BR /&gt;class-map sfr-global-class&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;match any&lt;BR /&gt;class-map inspection_default&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;match default-inspection-traffic&lt;BR /&gt;!&lt;BR /&gt;!&lt;BR /&gt;policy-map type inspect dns preset_dns_map&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;parameters&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; message-length maximum client auto&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; message-length maximum 512&lt;BR /&gt;policy-map global_policy&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;class inspection_default&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; inspect dns preset_dns_map&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; inspect ftp&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; inspect h323 h225&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; inspect h323 ras&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; inspect rsh&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; inspect rtsp&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; inspect esmtp&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; inspect sqlnet&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; inspect skinny&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; inspect sunrpc&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; inspect xdmcp&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; inspect sip&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; inspect netbios&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; inspect tftp&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; inspect ip-options&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;class sfr-global-class&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; sfr fail-open&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;With the config above, I can ping the gateway, the remote server and resolve the server FQDN, but can't add the module to the server.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;With that in mind, and logically speaking, this must point to a problem with either the server or elsewhere in the network?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2015 13:10:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-configuring-the-management-interface/m-p/2693337#M191523</guid>
      <dc:creator>petenixon</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-05-15T13:10:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>I eventually found what was</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-configuring-the-management-interface/m-p/2693338#M191524</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I eventually found what was causing the problem. The sourcefire module was dropping traffic as it entered the ASA....&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2015 15:39:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-configuring-the-management-interface/m-p/2693338#M191524</guid>
      <dc:creator>petenixon</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-06-01T15:39:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

