<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Hi, could any body help us? in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/bgp-implementation/m-p/2724709#M192345</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;could any body help us?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2015 07:51:41 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>dabur10376004</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-09-02T07:51:41Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>BGP implementation</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/bgp-implementation/m-p/2724705#M192337</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;we have 3 internet Links Like ISP 1, ISP 2 &amp;amp; ISP 3.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ISP 1---&amp;gt; ASA1---&amp;gt; Core switch&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ISP 2---&amp;gt; ASA2---&amp;gt; Core switch&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ISP 3---&amp;gt; ASA3---&amp;gt; Core switch&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;we have different services as per below.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;on ISP 1 ASA natted servers (Like mail, web server)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;on ISP&amp;nbsp;2 ASA natted servers (Like mail,&amp;nbsp;Botreeserver)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;on ISP&amp;nbsp;3 ASA Natted &amp;nbsp;(Like Lync,&amp;nbsp;SAP &amp;amp; business application server)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;now ISP 1 link got down then mail &amp;amp; web servers are not accessible from internet &amp;amp; same issue with other ISP.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;so we are planning to implement BGP for availability of all services every times from internet.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;After getting APNIC ip pool, we will implement.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;we have following&amp;nbsp;3 question as below:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. what is the best practice of BGP implementation.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. ISP 1 40 Mbps, ISP 2 60 Mbps &amp;amp; ISP 3 60 Mbps. After BGP implementation can we put QOS for bandwidth restriction (lets suppose its utilization will not reach beyond 30 Mbps)&amp;nbsp;for one proxy ip so that no any link get overutilized. the same QOS will apply on all three Internet router.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3. is any other mechanism apart from BGP?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Vinod&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 06:30:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/bgp-implementation/m-p/2724705#M192337</guid>
      <dc:creator>dabur10376004</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-12T06:30:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Refer following TAC document</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/bgp-implementation/m-p/2724706#M192341</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Refer following TAC document for BGP.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/security/asa-5500-x-series-next-generation-firewalls/118050-config-bgp-00.html#anc2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;R.Seth&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2015 17:53:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/bgp-implementation/m-p/2724706#M192341</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rishabh Seth</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-08-27T17:53:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hi,Can we achieve Load</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/bgp-implementation/m-p/2724707#M192343</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can we achieve Load balancing through BGP in&amp;nbsp;term of incoming traffic (from outside to inside)&amp;nbsp;&amp;amp; outgoing traffic (from inside to outside)&amp;nbsp;or BGP only support for Link redundancy.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2015 17:15:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/bgp-implementation/m-p/2724707#M192343</guid>
      <dc:creator>dabur10376004</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-08-31T17:15:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hi,is BGP is doing load</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/bgp-implementation/m-p/2724708#M192344</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;is BGP is doing load balancing or not , or only for link redundancy purpose.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Vinod&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2015 09:41:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/bgp-implementation/m-p/2724708#M192344</guid>
      <dc:creator>dabur10376004</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-09-01T09:41:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hi, could any body help us?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/bgp-implementation/m-p/2724709#M192345</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;could any body help us?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2015 07:51:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/bgp-implementation/m-p/2724709#M192345</guid>
      <dc:creator>dabur10376004</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-09-02T07:51:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

