<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic  Seems that correct way in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firewall-design-question/m-p/2765485#M192738</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Seems that correct way.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;MAhesh&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2015 01:26:53 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>mahesh18</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-08-18T01:26:53Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Firewall design question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firewall-design-question/m-p/2765483#M192736</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi everyone,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have two networks one for LAN users other for WIFI users.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Network 1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ASA1 users are connected and getting IP in subnet 10.0.0./24&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;vlan 1 10.0.0.0/24&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Network 2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;AP----10.31.2.37/24----Switch--Layer2-------trunk vlan 2 and 3-----------------------ASA2-----&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; |&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; |&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; WLC 10.31.2.35/24&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Where AP,switch and WLC have their gateway to ASA2 &amp;nbsp;IP 10.31.2.33&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;where vlan 2 is management vlan in Network 2.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Vlan 2 10.31.2.33/24&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I want that users PC connected to ASA1 on IP 10.0.0.0/24 should be able to access WLC and AP on 10.31.2.0/24 subnet?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Should i create vlan 2 on ASA1 and directly connect two interfaces of ASA1 and ASA2?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If i connect ASA1 to switch then traffic from user PC flows like this&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;PC-----ASA1-------Switch----AP-----&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Return traffic from AP goes to switch then to -----&amp;gt; ASA2&amp;nbsp; and traffic is dropped by ASA2 as it has not seen inital syn.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mahesh&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 06:26:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firewall-design-question/m-p/2765483#M192736</guid>
      <dc:creator>mahesh18</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-12T06:26:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Obviously there is a reason</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firewall-design-question/m-p/2765484#M192737</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Obviously there is a reason for the 2 ASAs, so I&amp;nbsp;would have link between the 2 ASAs with a /30&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;address, then use static routes on the ASAs&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;so say&amp;nbsp;new link on ASA1 have Ip address of 10.255.255.1/30&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and ASA2 have ip address of 10.255.255.2/30&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;then static route on ASA1: route 10.31.2.0/24 10.255.255.2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and on ASA2 route 10.0.0.0/24 10.255.255.1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;HTH&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2015 22:54:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firewall-design-question/m-p/2765484#M192737</guid>
      <dc:creator>Richard Bradfield</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-08-16T22:54:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title> Seems that correct way</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firewall-design-question/m-p/2765485#M192738</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Seems that correct way.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;MAhesh&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2015 01:26:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firewall-design-question/m-p/2765485#M192738</guid>
      <dc:creator>mahesh18</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-08-18T01:26:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

