<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Hi,Do you have the &amp;quot;show in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fwsm-failover-scenario/m-p/2712032#M194184</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do you have the "show failover" and "show failover history" output from around the time of the issue ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks and Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Vibhor Amrodia&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2015 04:47:10 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Vibhor Amrodia</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-07-05T04:47:10Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>FWSM Failover scenario</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fwsm-failover-scenario/m-p/2712031#M194183</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have FWSM in active/standby. &amp;nbsp;Primary was failed few days go, secondary has been active since then and we have disabled the failover.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yesterday, tried to put back primary, however the license was a mismatch, so we had to get the correct activation key and we rescheduled the activity and removed the primary FWSM blade.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, after that our secondary FWSM stopped working and we saw it changed the state to Pseudo stanbdy and acquired secondary ip addresses, hence stopped passing traffic. &amp;nbsp;We had to enable failover on secondary to bring it back to active state.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Has anyone experienced this scenario ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please note, we did not turn on the failover on the secondary FWSM.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Puneesh&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 06:12:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fwsm-failover-scenario/m-p/2712031#M194183</guid>
      <dc:creator>Puneesh Chhabra</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-12T06:12:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hi,Do you have the "show</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fwsm-failover-scenario/m-p/2712032#M194184</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do you have the "show failover" and "show failover history" output from around the time of the issue ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks and Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Vibhor Amrodia&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2015 04:47:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fwsm-failover-scenario/m-p/2712032#M194184</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vibhor Amrodia</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-05T04:47:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hi , Could you check if</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fwsm-failover-scenario/m-p/2712033#M194185</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi ,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Could you check if failover preempt option is enabled , if that would have been enabled secondary firewall would try to become standby as soon as it will detect primary.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Prateek Verma&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2015 06:03:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fwsm-failover-scenario/m-p/2712033#M194185</guid>
      <dc:creator>prateek.verma</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-08T06:03:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

