<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Hi,Agree with Rishabh and the in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-5500-nat-egress-interface/m-p/2637070#M195072</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Agree with Rishabh and the only workarounds possible are listed in this documents:-&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;https://supportforums.cisco.com/document/59986/loadbalancing-dual-isp-asa&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;https://supportforums.cisco.com/document/49756/asapix-load-balancing-between-two-isp-options&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks and Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Vibhor Amrodia&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2015 08:21:42 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Vibhor Amrodia</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-04-15T08:21:42Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ASA 5500 NAT Egress Interface</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-5500-nat-egress-interface/m-p/2637068#M195069</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have an ASA-5510 with double "outside" connection (two different provider).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The "primary" connection has the default route to outside interface, but I&amp;nbsp;need to NAT some machines on the "secondary"&amp;nbsp;interface.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I&amp;nbsp;configure the NAT, but I&amp;nbsp;do not have response; I can have response only by configuring a static route.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As show by the Cisco documentation, the NAT can automatically solve the EGRESS interface, but here it seems to NOT work&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I remember a similar&amp;nbsp;scenario, where I solved the throuble by removing the "IP reverse path verify" command.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But in that case the firmware was an 8.4.x and now it is a 9.1.5&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Some suggestion ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Claudio&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 05:45:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-5500-nat-egress-interface/m-p/2637068#M195069</guid>
      <dc:creator>battanc</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-12T05:45:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>If policy based routing can</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-5500-nat-egress-interface/m-p/2637069#M195071</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If policy based routing can help you in achieving your requirement then you may try ASA9.4 which supports PBR.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope it helps.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2015 11:33:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-5500-nat-egress-interface/m-p/2637069#M195071</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rishabh Seth</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-04-14T11:33:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hi,Agree with Rishabh and the</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-5500-nat-egress-interface/m-p/2637070#M195072</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Agree with Rishabh and the only workarounds possible are listed in this documents:-&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;https://supportforums.cisco.com/document/59986/loadbalancing-dual-isp-asa&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;https://supportforums.cisco.com/document/49756/asapix-load-balancing-between-two-isp-options&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks and Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Vibhor Amrodia&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2015 08:21:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-5500-nat-egress-interface/m-p/2637070#M195072</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vibhor Amrodia</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-04-15T08:21:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

