<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Thanks Jon.  I'll opt for the in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-redundant-dual-connections-to-the-same-isp/m-p/2633336#M196121</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks Jon.&amp;nbsp; I'll opt for the redundant interface option since I'm modifying an HSRP installation to have links to the firewall (currently there is only one link from one of the core switches).&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2015 13:28:36 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Scott Pickles</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-03-16T13:28:36Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ASA Redundant/Dual Connections to the SAME ISP</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-redundant-dual-connections-to-the-same-isp/m-p/2633334#M196119</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Is it possible to connect two ports on an ASA to the same ISP for physical port redundancy? &amp;nbsp;I know it's possible to connect to two different ISPs with different subnets, but in this case it would be the same ISP, same subnet. &amp;nbsp;I'm expecting the answer to be 'no' and that I'd have to bring up a 'cold spare' interface should the primary interface go down. &amp;nbsp;The ASA model is either 5520 or 5512-X, and I'd have to go get the software versions if anyone would like that information.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 05:38:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-redundant-dual-connections-to-the-same-isp/m-p/2633334#M196119</guid>
      <dc:creator>Scott Pickles</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-12T05:38:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>You can't give two ports an</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-redundant-dual-connections-to-the-same-isp/m-p/2633335#M196120</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You can't give two ports an IP from the same subnet in the same context no.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But you could either -&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1) use etherchannel&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;or&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2) use the redundant interface feature where you use two ports but only one is active and if it fails the other takes over with the same IP address&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jon&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2015 19:51:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-redundant-dual-connections-to-the-same-isp/m-p/2633335#M196120</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jon Marshall</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-03-13T19:51:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thanks Jon.  I'll opt for the</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-redundant-dual-connections-to-the-same-isp/m-p/2633336#M196121</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks Jon.&amp;nbsp; I'll opt for the redundant interface option since I'm modifying an HSRP installation to have links to the firewall (currently there is only one link from one of the core switches).&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2015 13:28:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-redundant-dual-connections-to-the-same-isp/m-p/2633336#M196121</guid>
      <dc:creator>Scott Pickles</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-03-16T13:28:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

