https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-redundant-interface/m-p/2662977#M196283 <P>No there isn't because by definition one is redundant.</P><P>If they were both separate interfaces and they were both active then they would need to have different IPs ie. be in different subnets which is not what you want.</P><P>The alternative is if the switches you are connecting to are a stack or 4500/6500 using VSS or Nexus with vPC then you could create an etherchannel with both ports and then they would both be active.</P><P>Jon</P> Tue, 10 Mar 2015 18:29:17 GMT Jon Marshall 2015-03-10T18:29:17Z https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-redundant-interface/m-p/2662976#M196281 <P>on the ASA5520 i have configured 2 interface as Redundant Interface&nbsp;the behavior of the these interfaces one will be active and the other one remian Stand by till the active one fail or forced to change my Question is there is any way to make those&nbsp;Redundant Interface in Active Active state because each on will connect to different Switch&nbsp;</P> Tue, 12 Mar 2019 05:37:08 GMT https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-redundant-interface/m-p/2662976#M196281 Ahmad Khalifa 2019-03-12T05:37:08Z https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-redundant-interface/m-p/2662977#M196283 <P>No there isn't because by definition one is redundant.</P><P>If they were both separate interfaces and they were both active then they would need to have different IPs ie. be in different subnets which is not what you want.</P><P>The alternative is if the switches you are connecting to are a stack or 4500/6500 using VSS or Nexus with vPC then you could create an etherchannel with both ports and then they would both be active.</P><P>Jon</P> Tue, 10 Mar 2015 18:29:17 GMT https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-redundant-interface/m-p/2662977#M196283 Jon Marshall 2015-03-10T18:29:17Z