<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Thanks Jon yes you are right. in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/inter-vlan-routing-using-subinterface-or-vlan-interface/m-p/2632398#M196517</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks Jon yes you are right.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2015 07:41:21 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Peyman Sadeghi</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-03-07T07:41:21Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Inter VLAN routing using subinterface or VLAN interface</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/inter-vlan-routing-using-subinterface-or-vlan-interface/m-p/2632396#M196514</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello All,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It seems that there are two methods in Cisco ASA to do the interVLAN routing as below:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1-&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Interface Gi 0/0&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;switport mode truck&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;switchport allowed&amp;nbsp;vlan 1,2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;int vlan 1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;no shut&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Int vlan 2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ip address 2.2.2.2 255.255.255.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;no shut&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2-&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Interface Gi 0/0&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;no ip&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;no shut&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;int Gi 0/0.1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;vlan 1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;no shut&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;int Gi 0/0.2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;vlan 2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ip address 2.2.2.2 255.255.255.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;no shut&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are these methods provide the same functionality/result? Which one is better and why? I want to implement an inter-vlan routing on 9.2.3.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 05:35:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/inter-vlan-routing-using-subinterface-or-vlan-interface/m-p/2632396#M196514</guid>
      <dc:creator>Peyman Sadeghi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-12T05:35:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>As far as I am aware the use</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/inter-vlan-routing-using-subinterface-or-vlan-interface/m-p/2632397#M196515</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;As far as I am aware the use of vlan interfaces is only for the ASA 5505.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any other model of ASA uses subinterfaces and a trunk connection.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So it depends on your model as to which you use.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jon&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2015 12:08:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/inter-vlan-routing-using-subinterface-or-vlan-interface/m-p/2632397#M196515</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jon Marshall</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-03-05T12:08:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thanks Jon yes you are right.</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/inter-vlan-routing-using-subinterface-or-vlan-interface/m-p/2632398#M196517</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks Jon yes you are right.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2015 07:41:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/inter-vlan-routing-using-subinterface-or-vlan-interface/m-p/2632398#M196517</guid>
      <dc:creator>Peyman Sadeghi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-03-07T07:41:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

