<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic John, Its unlikely you will in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-latency-issue/m-p/2575215#M199232</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;John,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Its unlikely you will ever get "the full bandwidth" for so many reasons. most ISP oversubscribe their bandwidth. we just got one large one to admit they have a deal with HULU and youtube to carry their traffic first, causing our citrix vdi traffic to crawl all day between NJ and Missiouri.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So, dont worry too much about the fact you are not getting "the full bandwidth".&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would go to speedtest.net for your area of the country, run 4-5 speed tests and figure out what you can expect. keep in mind, tcp rtt has a huge effect on how much utilization your tcp/ip stack can load on the network.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;finally, if you are concerned about the pix -&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;put a server right on the outside and do a bidirectional iperf test with a 1M window size to the server right outside the pix from your inside client&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;on server --&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;c:\users\admin\downloads\iperf -s -w 1M&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;on client&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;c:\users\admin\downloads\ipsef -c 65.10.10.10&amp;nbsp;-w 1M -d &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(where 65.10.10.10 is the server's ip on the outside of your Pix)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;if you get a really low speed - like 20mpbs - check the speed and duplex of all devices in the path.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I recommend auto/auto on all server, pix to switch, pix to router links.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Joe&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;19366&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2015 12:07:50 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>joe19366</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-01-19T12:07:50Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PIX latency issue</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-latency-issue/m-p/2575214#M199231</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have the following device&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cisco PIX Security Appliance Software Version 7.2(4)&lt;BR /&gt;Device Manager Version 5.2(4)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Compiled on Sun 06-Apr-08 13:39 by builders&lt;BR /&gt;System image file is "flash:/image.bin"&lt;BR /&gt;Config file at boot was "startup-config"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;FW1-Primary up 1 year 161 days&lt;BR /&gt;failover cluster up 2 years 32 days&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hardware:&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; PIX-525, 256 MB RAM, CPU Pentium III 600 MHz&lt;BR /&gt;Flash E28F128J3 @ 0xfff00000, 16MB&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have a 100Mbps uplink to the internet, yet we always seem not to get the full bandwidtth. I've ruled out a number of other factors, the uplink isn't over utilized I've confirmed this by placing myself outside the FW and I get alot more bandwidth. There's no interface errors, nor high CPU or memory utilzation. I'm just wondering if excessive disabled rules would play a factor? Are usual average rx is around 12Mbps and tx is 5Mbps, yet download speeds are crazy low.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any thoughts, thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;John&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 05:19:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-latency-issue/m-p/2575214#M199231</guid>
      <dc:creator>John Trumbell</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-12T05:19:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>John, Its unlikely you will</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-latency-issue/m-p/2575215#M199232</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;John,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Its unlikely you will ever get "the full bandwidth" for so many reasons. most ISP oversubscribe their bandwidth. we just got one large one to admit they have a deal with HULU and youtube to carry their traffic first, causing our citrix vdi traffic to crawl all day between NJ and Missiouri.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So, dont worry too much about the fact you are not getting "the full bandwidth".&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would go to speedtest.net for your area of the country, run 4-5 speed tests and figure out what you can expect. keep in mind, tcp rtt has a huge effect on how much utilization your tcp/ip stack can load on the network.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;finally, if you are concerned about the pix -&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;put a server right on the outside and do a bidirectional iperf test with a 1M window size to the server right outside the pix from your inside client&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;on server --&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;c:\users\admin\downloads\iperf -s -w 1M&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;on client&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;c:\users\admin\downloads\ipsef -c 65.10.10.10&amp;nbsp;-w 1M -d &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(where 65.10.10.10 is the server's ip on the outside of your Pix)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;if you get a really low speed - like 20mpbs - check the speed and duplex of all devices in the path.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I recommend auto/auto on all server, pix to switch, pix to router links.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Joe&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;19366&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2015 12:07:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-latency-issue/m-p/2575215#M199232</guid>
      <dc:creator>joe19366</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-01-19T12:07:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

