<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Yeah, that's what I'm in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-9-0-port-forwarding/m-p/2644074#M201216</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Yeah, that's what I'm thinking as well. I played with it some more and I was able to get it to work using network object NAT, but at that point I can only forward one port to that network object. If I try to configure another port, it will overwrite the original with the new port.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nat (inside,outside) source static Inside_hosts NAT_NETWORK destination static REMOTE_NETWORK REMOTE_NETWORK&lt;BR /&gt;!&lt;BR /&gt;object network PC_IP&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;nat (any,outside) static interface service tcp 3389 3389&lt;BR /&gt;!&lt;BR /&gt;nat (any,any) after-auto source static VPN_USERS VPN_USERS destination static Inside_hosts Inside_hosts&lt;BR /&gt;nat (inside,outside) after-auto source dynamic Inside_hosts interface&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I tried to forward UDP 69 and TCP 3389 and only one would work at a time. There has to be a way to forward multiple non-contiguous ports to the same host correct?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2015 16:21:38 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>layne.peterson1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-04-24T16:21:38Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ASA 9.0 Port forwarding</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-9-0-port-forwarding/m-p/2644072#M201207</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I've got an ASA 5505 and I'm not very familiar with ASAs, let alone the 8.3+ release versions. I'm trying to set up some port forwarding, and using port 3389 just to test. I have this set up in the ASA:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;object network PC_IP&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;nat (inside,outside) static interface service tcp 3389 3389&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And these access-rules set up to allow it:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;access-list outside_access_in extended permit object PC_T3389 any object PC_IP&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;After the first rule didn't work I tried this, without restricting IP at all.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;access-list outside_access_in extended permit object PC_T3389 any any&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When I actually test it or use Packet Tracer it doesn't work. Here is the output from Packet Tracer:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;packet-tracer input outside tcp 66.236.77.178 61000 208.64.90.2 3389&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Phase: 1&lt;BR /&gt;Type: ROUTE-LOOKUP&lt;BR /&gt;Subtype: input&lt;BR /&gt;Result: ALLOW&lt;BR /&gt;Config:&lt;BR /&gt;Additional Information:&lt;BR /&gt;in &amp;nbsp; 208.64.90.2 &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; 255.255.255.255 identity&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Phase: 2&lt;BR /&gt;Type: NAT&lt;BR /&gt;Subtype: per-session&lt;BR /&gt;Result: ALLOW&lt;BR /&gt;Config:&lt;BR /&gt;Additional Information:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Phase: 3&lt;BR /&gt;Type: ACCESS-LIST&lt;BR /&gt;Subtype:&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;Result: DROP&lt;BR /&gt;Config:&lt;BR /&gt;Implicit Rule&lt;BR /&gt;Additional Information:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Result:&lt;BR /&gt;input-interface: outside&lt;BR /&gt;input-status: up&lt;BR /&gt;input-line-status: up&lt;BR /&gt;output-interface: NP Identity Ifc&lt;BR /&gt;output-status: up&lt;BR /&gt;output-line-status: up&lt;BR /&gt;Action: drop&lt;BR /&gt;Drop-reason: (acl-drop) Flow is denied by configured rule&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 05:49:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-9-0-port-forwarding/m-p/2644072#M201207</guid>
      <dc:creator>layne.peterson1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-12T05:49:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hi,This is a NAT</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-9-0-port-forwarding/m-p/2644073#M201212</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is a NAT misconfiguration and i would request you to post the NAT commands from the ASA device .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks and Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Vibhor Amrodia&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2015 05:04:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-9-0-port-forwarding/m-p/2644073#M201212</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vibhor Amrodia</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-04-24T05:04:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Yeah, that's what I'm</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-9-0-port-forwarding/m-p/2644074#M201216</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yeah, that's what I'm thinking as well. I played with it some more and I was able to get it to work using network object NAT, but at that point I can only forward one port to that network object. If I try to configure another port, it will overwrite the original with the new port.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nat (inside,outside) source static Inside_hosts NAT_NETWORK destination static REMOTE_NETWORK REMOTE_NETWORK&lt;BR /&gt;!&lt;BR /&gt;object network PC_IP&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;nat (any,outside) static interface service tcp 3389 3389&lt;BR /&gt;!&lt;BR /&gt;nat (any,any) after-auto source static VPN_USERS VPN_USERS destination static Inside_hosts Inside_hosts&lt;BR /&gt;nat (inside,outside) after-auto source dynamic Inside_hosts interface&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I tried to forward UDP 69 and TCP 3389 and only one would work at a time. There has to be a way to forward multiple non-contiguous ports to the same host correct?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2015 16:21:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-9-0-port-forwarding/m-p/2644074#M201216</guid>
      <dc:creator>layne.peterson1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-04-24T16:21:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hi,The only way is using the</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-9-0-port-forwarding/m-p/2644075#M201218</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The only way is using the Object NAT and use the Range Keyword for forwarding the contiguous ports.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There is no way to forward multiple dis contiguous ports on the ASA device.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks and Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Vibhor Amrodia&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2015 03:14:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-9-0-port-forwarding/m-p/2644075#M201218</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vibhor Amrodia</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-04-25T03:14:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

