<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Thanks. I've read many things in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/doubt-regarding-tcp-timestamp-response/m-p/2595152#M203901</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks. I've read many things about this. I just need a recommendation because I need to find a balance: I can clear timestamps, using tcp-map, but I've read PAWS is going to be disabled, and this might cause many TCP sessions to be reset.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2014 14:19:16 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Soporteco</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-11-13T14:19:16Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Doubt regarding TCP Timestamp response</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/doubt-regarding-tcp-timestamp-response/m-p/2595150#M203899</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi. I know some forums have been created regarding this issue. I've read many things, nevertheless It's still not very clear to me. A client asked us to give them a recommendation about this vulnerability:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;TCP timestamp response&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I know this feature can help an attacker to calculate a server's uptime. But, should I recommend them to configure anything in the ASA to mitigate this vulnerability? Clearing TCP timestamps? What's its impact? --&amp;gt; "&lt;SPAN style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; line-height: normal;"&gt;Clearing the timestamp option disables PAWS and RTT." --&amp;gt; ??&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(They have&amp;nbsp;CISCO ASA 9.1(5)10 and&amp;nbsp;CISCO ASA 9.0(1))&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks a lot!!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 05:04:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/doubt-regarding-tcp-timestamp-response/m-p/2595150#M203899</guid>
      <dc:creator>Soporteco</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-12T05:04:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hi,Check this for more</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/doubt-regarding-tcp-timestamp-response/m-p/2595151#M203900</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Check this for more information:-&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;https://supportforums.cisco.com/discussion/12323026/tcp-timestamps-security-vulnerabilities&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks and Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Vibhor Amrodia&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2014 02:48:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/doubt-regarding-tcp-timestamp-response/m-p/2595151#M203900</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vibhor Amrodia</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-11-13T02:48:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thanks. I've read many things</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/doubt-regarding-tcp-timestamp-response/m-p/2595152#M203901</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks. I've read many things about this. I just need a recommendation because I need to find a balance: I can clear timestamps, using tcp-map, but I've read PAWS is going to be disabled, and this might cause many TCP sessions to be reset.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2014 14:19:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/doubt-regarding-tcp-timestamp-response/m-p/2595152#M203901</guid>
      <dc:creator>Soporteco</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-11-13T14:19:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

