<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic ASA failover question in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-failover-question/m-p/2550396#M234517</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I noticed that one of my ASA 5545X failover pairs has the secondary unit listed as active&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;show failover&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;failover on&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;failover unit Secondary&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;This host: Secondary - Active&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If I type&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;no failover active&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;will that set things right (make the primary unit in the inactive state active again)?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 04:50:04 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Colin Higgins</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-03-12T04:50:04Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ASA failover question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-failover-question/m-p/2550396#M234517</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I noticed that one of my ASA 5545X failover pairs has the secondary unit listed as active&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;show failover&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;failover on&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;failover unit Secondary&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;This host: Secondary - Active&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If I type&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;no failover active&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;will that set things right (make the primary unit in the inactive state active again)?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 04:50:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-failover-question/m-p/2550396#M234517</guid>
      <dc:creator>Colin Higgins</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-12T04:50:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Yes - as long as the Primary</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-failover-question/m-p/2550397#M234519</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes - as long as the Primary unit is currently in "Standby Ready" status, typing the above command on the Secondary - Active unit will cause a failover event and change the Primary unit to Active state.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2014 15:30:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-failover-question/m-p/2550397#M234519</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marvin Rhoads</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-09-29T15:30:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

