<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Hello Karsten,Thanks a lot. I in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/why-can-t-the-inside-interface-with-a-higher-security-level-on/m-p/2550559#M235401</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello Karsten,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks a lot. I was pinging the lower security level on the ASA-interface. I can ping a system in the DMZ now.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2014 12:43:41 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Joseph Oloyede</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-08-21T12:43:41Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Why can't the inside interface with a higher security level on ASA 5545 ping the DMZ interface with a lower security level</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/why-can-t-the-inside-interface-with-a-higher-security-level-on/m-p/2550555#M235397</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Why can't the inside interface with a higher security level on ASA 5545 ping the DMZ interface with a lower security level. No NAT is configured. I expect by default, i should be able to ping a lower security level from an higher security level interface on the ASA.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 04:39:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/why-can-t-the-inside-interface-with-a-higher-security-level-on/m-p/2550555#M235397</guid>
      <dc:creator>Joseph Oloyede</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-12T04:39:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>If there is no ACL applied to</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/why-can-t-the-inside-interface-with-a-higher-security-level-on/m-p/2550556#M235398</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If there is no ACL applied to the higher interface that denies the traffic, then the higher security-system can ping the system on the lower level.&amp;nbsp;But with the ASA-defaults, ICMP is not stateful and the replies are dropped. To make it staeful you have to extend your default policy-map:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;CODE&gt;policy-map global_policy&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;class inspection_default&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;STRONG&gt;inspect icmp&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2014 11:30:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/why-can-t-the-inside-interface-with-a-higher-security-level-on/m-p/2550556#M235398</guid>
      <dc:creator>Karsten Iwen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-08-21T11:30:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hello Karsten,Thanks for the</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/why-can-t-the-inside-interface-with-a-higher-security-level-on/m-p/2550557#M235399</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello Karsten,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the reply, have included the command, but still cannot ping the lower interface.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2014 11:57:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/why-can-t-the-inside-interface-with-a-higher-security-level-on/m-p/2550557#M235399</guid>
      <dc:creator>Joseph Oloyede</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-08-21T11:57:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What are you trying exactly?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/why-can-t-the-inside-interface-with-a-higher-security-level-on/m-p/2550558#M235400</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;What are you trying &lt;STRONG&gt;exactly&lt;/STRONG&gt;? Ping a system on the lower security-level or the lower security-level ASA-interface? The later is not supported on the ASA. Then test it with a ping to a system in the DMZ.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2014 12:31:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/why-can-t-the-inside-interface-with-a-higher-security-level-on/m-p/2550558#M235400</guid>
      <dc:creator>Karsten Iwen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-08-21T12:31:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hello Karsten,Thanks a lot. I</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/why-can-t-the-inside-interface-with-a-higher-security-level-on/m-p/2550559#M235401</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello Karsten,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks a lot. I was pinging the lower security level on the ASA-interface. I can ping a system in the DMZ now.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2014 12:43:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/why-can-t-the-inside-interface-with-a-higher-security-level-on/m-p/2550559#M235401</guid>
      <dc:creator>Joseph Oloyede</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-08-21T12:43:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

