<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic I think that it's not in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-5500-x-rfc3069/m-p/2528047#M235511</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I think that it's not possible natively. But there could be two ways to achieve the same thing, but it's questionable if these ways match your needs:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;On the ASASM there are private VLANs supported which could give you the needed functionality. Ok, the pricetag is a "little" higher than a 5500-X.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;If you don't mind adding a lot of complexity and some additional licensing cost, then you could achieve a similar thing through virtual contexts. The customers each get a&amp;nbsp;transparent context to an external router or a cascaded routed-context.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you find any other solution, please post them here. I'm also searching for a suitable solution for a hosting-environment where we don't want to waste that much IP-addresses.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2014 09:53:59 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Karsten Iwen</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-08-16T09:53:59Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ASA 5500-X RFC3069</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-5500-x-rfc3069/m-p/2528046#M235510</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;is there a way to configure RFC3069-Support on ASA 5500-X?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would like to do this:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;A href="http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/25933" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/25933&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But i would like to add some firewall support (ACLs and so on) .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Harald&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 04:38:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-5500-x-rfc3069/m-p/2528046#M235510</guid>
      <dc:creator>Harald S</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-12T04:38:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>I think that it's not</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-5500-x-rfc3069/m-p/2528047#M235511</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I think that it's not possible natively. But there could be two ways to achieve the same thing, but it's questionable if these ways match your needs:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;On the ASASM there are private VLANs supported which could give you the needed functionality. Ok, the pricetag is a "little" higher than a 5500-X.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;If you don't mind adding a lot of complexity and some additional licensing cost, then you could achieve a similar thing through virtual contexts. The customers each get a&amp;nbsp;transparent context to an external router or a cascaded routed-context.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you find any other solution, please post them here. I'm also searching for a suitable solution for a hosting-environment where we don't want to waste that much IP-addresses.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2014 09:53:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-5500-x-rfc3069/m-p/2528047#M235511</guid>
      <dc:creator>Karsten Iwen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-08-16T09:53:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

