<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Hi karthik,thanks for your in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/same-security-traffic-command/m-p/2506640#M236171</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi karthik,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks for your response!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i realized that ACL matters as compared to the default security provided by the 'security-level' of each interface.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2014 05:05:21 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>johnlloyd_13</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-07-28T05:05:21Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>same-security-traffic Command</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/same-security-traffic-command/m-p/2506638#M236169</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;hi all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i'm going to configure a new ASA 5525-X from scratch.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;several clients will be connected and will be NAT'd on the ASA.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;my question is, is it a 'best' practice to have different security levels for my clients or do i&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;set the same security level (i.e. 100) and configure (or not?) the &lt;STRONG&gt;same-security-traffic permit inter-interface &lt;/STRONG&gt;command.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 04:32:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/same-security-traffic-command/m-p/2506638#M236169</guid>
      <dc:creator>johnlloyd_13</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-12T04:32:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hi John, I am gonna give you</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/same-security-traffic-command/m-p/2506639#M236170</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi John,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am gonna give you the mixed response.... if you have the required ACL's in place, then security level what you define in interface will not have a major value to it.....&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But it is good to define a different security levels for different interfaces in order to define a more secured and the less secured network of yours...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But anything you do will not make a major difference...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Karthik&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2014 05:34:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/same-security-traffic-command/m-p/2506639#M236170</guid>
      <dc:creator>nkarthikeyan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-07-27T05:34:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hi karthik,thanks for your</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/same-security-traffic-command/m-p/2506640#M236171</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi karthik,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks for your response!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i realized that ACL matters as compared to the default security provided by the 'security-level' of each interface.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2014 05:05:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/same-security-traffic-command/m-p/2506640#M236171</guid>
      <dc:creator>johnlloyd_13</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-07-28T05:05:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

