<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Summarizing ACLs in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/summarizing-acls/m-p/2469653#M238158</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I would like to block networks 10.0.0.0/24 through 10.0.239.0/24 from accessing networks 10.0.240/20&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've come to the conclusion that the best way of doing this is with 4 separate acl's:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ACL 1 - 0.0 - 127.255&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ACL 2 - 128.0 - 191.255&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ACL 3 - 192.0 - 223.255&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ACL 4 - 224.0 - 239.255&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm wondering of this is correct, or if there is a way to encompass 10.0.0.0 - 10.0.239.255 into once ACL statement.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As always, thank you in advance.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 04:14:52 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jared Burton</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-03-12T04:14:52Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Summarizing ACLs</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/summarizing-acls/m-p/2469653#M238158</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I would like to block networks 10.0.0.0/24 through 10.0.239.0/24 from accessing networks 10.0.240/20&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've come to the conclusion that the best way of doing this is with 4 separate acl's:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ACL 1 - 0.0 - 127.255&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ACL 2 - 128.0 - 191.255&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ACL 3 - 192.0 - 223.255&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ACL 4 - 224.0 - 239.255&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm wondering of this is correct, or if there is a way to encompass 10.0.0.0 - 10.0.239.255 into once ACL statement.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As always, thank you in advance.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 04:14:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/summarizing-acls/m-p/2469653#M238158</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jared Burton</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-12T04:14:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>There is no way to</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/summarizing-acls/m-p/2469654#M238159</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;There is no way to accommodate networks 10.0.0.0/ 24 through 10.0.239.0/24 in one ACL statement.&amp;nbsp; The most efficient solution is the one that you have already presented.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2014 11:11:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/summarizing-acls/m-p/2469654#M238159</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ri0N</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-05-27T11:11:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

