<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic If you have a netblock from in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/open-same-port-for-multiple-servers/m-p/2441546#M267362</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;If you have a netblock from which you can assign multiple IP addresses then, yes - just asign additional access-list entries and static NAT entries.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you only had a single (or limited number all in use) public IP address then you would have to use some sort of PAT (port address translation). for instance:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;server 0 is &amp;lt;outside address&amp;gt;:80&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;server 1 is &amp;lt;outside address&amp;gt;:81&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;server 2 is &amp;lt;outside address&amp;gt;:82&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;..etc. Your remote users would then have to specify the non-default port (80/81/82) when browsing to the site.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2014 18:25:26 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Marvin Rhoads</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-04-21T18:25:26Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Open same port for multiple servers.</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/open-same-port-for-multiple-servers/m-p/2441545#M267361</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am sorry if this sounds rudimentary, but I wanted to make sure. I want to open up port 80 to more than one web server. I already have port 80 open on one public IP address and have another one ready to use for another server. My assumption is that I should just be able to create a policy using the additional IP address and use port 80 without any issues. Is that correct to assume? I would also like to know, how one would do this is they only had one public IP address. I believe these should be relatively easy questions for the experts here. Thanks. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 04:06:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/open-same-port-for-multiple-servers/m-p/2441545#M267361</guid>
      <dc:creator>joescott4t</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-12T04:06:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>If you have a netblock from</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/open-same-port-for-multiple-servers/m-p/2441546#M267362</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If you have a netblock from which you can assign multiple IP addresses then, yes - just asign additional access-list entries and static NAT entries.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you only had a single (or limited number all in use) public IP address then you would have to use some sort of PAT (port address translation). for instance:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;server 0 is &amp;lt;outside address&amp;gt;:80&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;server 1 is &amp;lt;outside address&amp;gt;:81&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;server 2 is &amp;lt;outside address&amp;gt;:82&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;..etc. Your remote users would then have to specify the non-default port (80/81/82) when browsing to the site.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2014 18:25:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/open-same-port-for-multiple-servers/m-p/2441546#M267362</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marvin Rhoads</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-04-21T18:25:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

