<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Failover ASA pairs are in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/management-in-failover-mode/m-p/2484543#M268181</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Failover ASA pairs are generally co-located as their inside and outside networks etc. are required to be the same. I suppose the thinking is if those are all present why not management too?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2014 15:50:28 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Marvin Rhoads</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-03-20T15:50:28Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>management in Failover mode.</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/management-in-failover-mode/m-p/2484542#M268180</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a question on management of ASA confifigured with ASA failover. I dont understand why the management ips on both ASA need to be on the same subnet and why management configuration should be part of the configuration synchronization between the ASAs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My question came up because we have both ASAs located in different location has&amp;nbsp;Out-of-band management IP in different subnet &amp;nbsp;and we wanted to configure ASA failover feature.... The one solution is to extend the vlan to the second location but I dont understand why such implementation ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope to learn the philosphy behind this &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Umair&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 03:58:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/management-in-failover-mode/m-p/2484542#M268180</guid>
      <dc:creator>kthned</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-12T03:58:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Failover ASA pairs are</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/management-in-failover-mode/m-p/2484543#M268181</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Failover ASA pairs are generally co-located as their inside and outside networks etc. are required to be the same. I suppose the thinking is if those are all present why not management too?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2014 15:50:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/management-in-failover-mode/m-p/2484543#M268181</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marvin Rhoads</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-03-20T15:50:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

