<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: NAT Statement translation in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-statement-translation/m-p/2469374#M270085</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; Anyone able to reply&amp;nbsp; above query. Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2014 10:43:26 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>raza555</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-02-27T10:43:26Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>NAT Statement translation</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-statement-translation/m-p/2469371#M270075</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am looking at below NAT statement in our system, but not understanding that what it means or whats the purpose of this statement.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This NAT statement is on VPN ASA and I understand that it means ANYsource traffic on OUTSIDE interface hitting OUTSIDE interface towards destination NETWORK_OBJ_192.168.1.0_24, its source and destination will remain same. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But what’s the purpose of this statement?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nat (Outside,Outside) source static any any destination static NETWORK_OBJ_192.168.1.0_24 NETWORK_OBJ_192.168.1.0_24 no-proxy-arp route-lookup&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nat (Outside,Outside) source static any any destination static NETWORK_OBJ_192.168.2.0_24 NETWORK_OBJ_192.168.2.0_24 no-proxy-arp route-lookup&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 03:42:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-statement-translation/m-p/2469371#M270075</guid>
      <dc:creator>raza555</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-12T03:42:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NAT Statement translation</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-statement-translation/m-p/2469372#M270077</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Though I wouldn't configure it in that way it seems that this configuration is meant to enable traffic between 2 different VPN connections. It might be traffic from one L2L VPN to another or from VPN Client to L2L VPN.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It looks for any traffic coming from behind &lt;STRONG&gt;"OUTSIDE"&lt;/STRONG&gt; towards the networks 192.168.1.0/24 and 192.168.2.0/24 that are also located behind interface &lt;STRONG&gt;"OUTSIDE"&lt;/STRONG&gt; and says that no NAT should be performed for either the source or the destination. Same naturally applies in the reverse direction.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So networks 192.168.1.0/24 and 192.168.2.0/24 are probably some remote locations or VPN Pool networks on your ASA&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope this helps &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="happy" __jive_macro_name="emoticon" class="jive_macro jive_emote" src="https://community.cisco.com/images/emoticons/happy.gif"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Jouni&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2014 15:52:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-statement-translation/m-p/2469372#M270077</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jouni Forss</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-02-07T15:52:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>NAT Statement translation</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-statement-translation/m-p/2469373#M270080</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You are right that 192.168.1.0/24 and 192.168.2.0/24 are VPN pool networks associated to VPN clients.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As per your recommendation, how you will prefer to configure it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2014 22:49:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-statement-translation/m-p/2469373#M270080</guid>
      <dc:creator>raza555</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-02-07T22:49:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NAT Statement translation</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-statement-translation/m-p/2469374#M270085</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; Anyone able to reply&amp;nbsp; above query. Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2014 10:43:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-statement-translation/m-p/2469374#M270085</guid>
      <dc:creator>raza555</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-02-27T10:43:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>NAT Statement translation</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-statement-translation/m-p/2469375#M270086</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;With regards to the NAT0 configuration for the traffic between the 2 VPN networks I would configure in the following way&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;object network VPN-1&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt; subnet 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;object network VPN-2&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt; subnet 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;nat (OUTSIDE,OUTSIDE) source static VPN-1 VPN-1 destination static VPN-2 VPN-2&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This should handle the NAT0 between these 2 VPN networks without resorting to 2 &lt;STRONG&gt;"nat"&lt;/STRONG&gt; commands.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Of the 2 other configurations you mention next the first one seems to be a normal Dynamic PAT configuration between LAN and WAN&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The second configuration seems a bit odd and I would have to guess that its result of a automatic NAT conversion perhaps? Have you updated the software on this ASA unit from older 8.2 (or older) software? It might be related to having &lt;STRONG&gt;"nat-control"&lt;/STRONG&gt; setting on the old software. I am however not 100% sure as I convert the configurations manually.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Jouni&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2014 10:51:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-statement-translation/m-p/2469375#M270086</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jouni Forss</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-02-27T10:51:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

