topic Cisco ASA Failover question in Network Security https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cisco-asa-failover-question/m-p/2410844#M271018 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><P>Hi,</P><P></P><P>Yes, the failover would get enabled.</P><P></P><P>- Prateek Verma</P><DIV id="__tbSetup"> </DIV></BODY></HTML> Thu, 23 Jan 2014 13:14:54 GMT prateeve 2014-01-23T13:14:54Z Cisco ASA Failover question https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cisco-asa-failover-question/m-p/2410843#M271017 <P>Hi all,</P><P></P><P>I have a question regarding the Cisco ASA Failover deployment with <SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;">Cisco ASA 5520 (IOS 9.0.3)</SPAN><SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;">:</SPAN></P><P></P><P><SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;">One of the subinterfaces that I want to monitor has a subnetmask /30 (1.1.1.0/30). </SPAN><SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;">Therefore </SPAN><SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;">I will not be able to assign an Standby IP Address for this interface. </SPAN></P><P></P><P><SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;">With this scenario, I will be able to enable failover for this interface without changing the netmask?</SPAN></P><P></P><P></P><P></P><P>Regards,</P> Tue, 12 Mar 2019 03:34:45 GMT https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cisco-asa-failover-question/m-p/2410843#M271017 joan.luque 2019-03-12T03:34:45Z Cisco ASA Failover question https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cisco-asa-failover-question/m-p/2410844#M271018 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><P>Hi,</P><P></P><P>Yes, the failover would get enabled.</P><P></P><P>- Prateek Verma</P><DIV id="__tbSetup"> </DIV></BODY></HTML> Thu, 23 Jan 2014 13:14:54 GMT https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cisco-asa-failover-question/m-p/2410844#M271018 prateeve 2014-01-23T13:14:54Z Cisco ASA Failover question https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cisco-asa-failover-question/m-p/2410845#M271020 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><P>Hi Prateek, thanks for your quick reply.</P><P></P><P><SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;">With this scenario I will have any limitation? I assume that with only a IP address for the Primary ASA interface the monitorning this would not be possible, right?</SPAN></P><P></P><P>In any case, when the failover occurs would the Secondary ASA follow the service for this interface?</P><P></P><P></P><P>Regards,</P></BODY></HTML> Thu, 23 Jan 2014 13:42:11 GMT https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cisco-asa-failover-question/m-p/2410845#M271020 joan.luque 2014-01-23T13:42:11Z Cisco ASA Failover question https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cisco-asa-failover-question/m-p/2410846#M271022 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><P>Hi,</P><P></P><P>Yes, the monitoring would not occur so if this interface fails failover would not occur but if failover occurs due to some other problem the secondary firewall would take the ip address of the interface of primary firewall.</P><P></P><P>- Prateek Verma</P><DIV id="__tbSetup"> </DIV></BODY></HTML> Thu, 23 Jan 2014 13:45:07 GMT https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cisco-asa-failover-question/m-p/2410846#M271022 prateeve 2014-01-23T13:45:07Z Cisco ASA Failover question https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cisco-asa-failover-question/m-p/2410847#M271025 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><P>Thanks!</P><P></P><P>I will try <SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="happy" __jive_macro_name="emoticon" class="jive_macro jive_emote" src="https://community.cisco.com/4.5.4/images/emoticons/happy.gif"></SPAN></P><P></P><P></P><P>Regards,</P></BODY></HTML> Thu, 23 Jan 2014 13:51:33 GMT https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cisco-asa-failover-question/m-p/2410847#M271025 joan.luque 2014-01-23T13:51:33Z