<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Zone Based Firewall inspection question in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/zone-based-firewall-inspection-question/m-p/2383188#M306460</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I agree with jcarvaja, the first option you posted is the better option.&amp;nbsp; you are already defining that the protocol is TCP in the ACL so no need to define it again in the class map.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-- &lt;BR /&gt;Please remember to rate and select a correct answer&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jan 2014 10:04:32 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Marius Gunnerud</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-01-03T10:04:32Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Zone Based Firewall inspection question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/zone-based-firewall-inspection-question/m-p/2383186#M306458</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Everyone,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am thinking on best way of&amp;nbsp; doing class-map for inspection of traffic coming on &lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;a not well-known &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;TCP port.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;My question is whether do it via an access-list only, like&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list in-traff permit tcp host x.x.x.x host y.y.y.y eq 2085&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;class-map type inspect match-any IN-cmap&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; match access-group name in-traff&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Or, it would be better to do it like this:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list in-traff permit tcp host x.x.x.x host y.y.y.y eq 2085&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;class-map type inspect match-all IN-cmap&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;match protocol tcp &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;match access-group name in-traff&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Since I have tcp mentioned on ACL already, I am wondering if match protcol tcp would really do any deeper inspection.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 03:24:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/zone-based-firewall-inspection-question/m-p/2383186#M306458</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mr Brightside</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-12T03:24:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Zone Based Firewall inspection question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/zone-based-firewall-inspection-question/m-p/2383187#M306459</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello Farhad,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I will go with the First option (ACL only).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There is no need to go any further as there will be no advantages of a deeper inspection as this is not a well known protocol (And just for you to know on both the match protocol TCP and match access-group name you are matching at layer 4 so it's redundant)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Looking for some Networking Assistance?&amp;nbsp; &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Contact me directly at &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-email-small" href="mailto:jcarvaja@laguiadelnetworking.com"&gt;jcarvaja@laguiadelnetworking.com&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;I will fix your problem ASAP. &lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;Cheers, &lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;Julio Carvajal Segura &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://laguiadelnetworking.com"&gt;http://laguiadelnetworking.com&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jan 2014 08:45:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/zone-based-firewall-inspection-question/m-p/2383187#M306459</guid>
      <dc:creator>Julio Carvajal</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-01-03T08:45:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Zone Based Firewall inspection question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/zone-based-firewall-inspection-question/m-p/2383188#M306460</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I agree with jcarvaja, the first option you posted is the better option.&amp;nbsp; you are already defining that the protocol is TCP in the ACL so no need to define it again in the class map.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-- &lt;BR /&gt;Please remember to rate and select a correct answer&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jan 2014 10:04:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/zone-based-firewall-inspection-question/m-p/2383188#M306460</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marius Gunnerud</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-01-03T10:04:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

