<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Two NAT Rules for a connection in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/two-nat-rules-for-a-connection/m-p/2368918#M306525</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; What version of code are you running on your ASA?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2013 02:59:36 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>zippy_831</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-12-31T02:59:36Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Two NAT Rules for a connection</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/two-nat-rules-for-a-connection/m-p/2368916#M306523</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; I am trying to understand if this is possible in any way as this is one of my upcoming project requirement. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; I need to have two nat rules for a connection. Say i would NAT source in one nat rule and would nat destination in other one. &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 03:23:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/two-nat-rules-for-a-connection/m-p/2368916#M306523</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rajtilak Sivaluri</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-12T03:23:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Two NAT Rules for a connection</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/two-nat-rules-for-a-connection/m-p/2368917#M306524</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;If I understand you correctly, then yes it is possible. Can you give more specifics and we can tell for sure?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Dec 2013 17:33:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/two-nat-rules-for-a-connection/m-p/2368917#M306524</guid>
      <dc:creator>Collin Clark</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-12-30T17:33:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Two NAT Rules for a connection</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/two-nat-rules-for-a-connection/m-p/2368918#M306525</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; What version of code are you running on your ASA?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2013 02:59:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/two-nat-rules-for-a-connection/m-p/2368918#M306525</guid>
      <dc:creator>zippy_831</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-12-31T02:59:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Two NAT Rules for a connection</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/two-nat-rules-for-a-connection/m-p/2368919#M306526</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Yes, it's possible. If you're using the newer ASA code (8.3+), you can use 'any' keyword for your NAT ingress or egress interface.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPhone App&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2013 10:04:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/two-nat-rules-for-a-connection/m-p/2368919#M306526</guid>
      <dc:creator>johnlloyd_13</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-12-31T10:04:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>HiThanks for you reply, But i</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/two-nat-rules-for-a-connection/m-p/2368920#M306527</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for you reply, But i still dont understand how the logic works. As per the working of the firewall, if any rule matches it would generally not go to any other rule below.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I assume this case with&amp;nbsp;ACL being applied only at in direction of the each interface but not for out.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2014 11:10:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/two-nat-rules-for-a-connection/m-p/2368920#M306527</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rajtilak Sivaluri</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-08-04T11:10:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

