<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Route map nat question in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/route-map-nat-question/m-p/2401843#M306802</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;This configuration is beyond my understanding of Cisco natting.&amp;nbsp; Actually most of it is beyond, but I set it up anyway.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have two connections out of our building.&amp;nbsp; Our internet link (named SirenTel), and a connection to the state network which is forwarded to another router in our DMZ.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think I need a route map to fix my problem but not sure.&amp;nbsp; I had everything configured and working, but nobody could get out of our second state link.&amp;nbsp; So I had to add this line to the configuration:&amp;nbsp; "nat (any,DMZ) after-auto source dynamic any interface"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Then the static routes to the state network started to work.&amp;nbsp; Now a new problem with any devices in the DMZ, they cannot access the internet.&amp;nbsp; Connections initiated from the internet are able to reach them correctly.&amp;nbsp; I receive this error in the log: &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;"Asymmetric NAT rules matched for forward and reverse flows; Connection for udp src DMZ:10.167.42.15/53294 dst SirenTel:8.8.8.8/53 denied due to NAT reverse path failure"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do I need a conditional nat for that DMZ link to the state network?&amp;nbsp; I need everyone on our network (multiple vlans) to be able to send through that route, so not sure how to write it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My second, unrelated problem is with trying to ping devices outside our network.&amp;nbsp; The reply gets denied due to firewall rules, but shouldn't established connections come back through?&amp;nbsp; For the few devices I wanted to monitor outside my network I had to add a permit for icmp traffic from those addresses.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Hopefully the relevant config lines:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;route SirenTel 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 64.33.171.81 2&lt;BR /&gt;route DMZ 165.189.42.0 255.255.255.0 10.167.42.1 1&lt;BR /&gt;route DMZ 165.189.52.65 255.255.255.255 10.167.42.1 1&lt;BR /&gt;route DMZ 165.189.96.0 255.255.255.0 10.167.42.1 1&lt;BR /&gt;route DMZ 167.218.0.0 255.255.0.0 10.167.42.1 1&lt;BR /&gt;route DMZ 198.150.235.253 255.255.255.255 10.167.42.1 1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;object network 10.167.42.15&lt;BR /&gt;nat (DMZ,SirenTel) static 64.33.171.93&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nat (any,DMZ) after-auto source dynamic any interface&lt;BR /&gt;nat (any,SirenTel) after-auto source dynamic any interface&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list SirenTel_access_in extended permit icmp object-group DM_INLINE_NETWORK_15 any4&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for any assistance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- James&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 03:20:56 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>burnettcounty</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-03-12T03:20:56Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Route map nat question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/route-map-nat-question/m-p/2401843#M306802</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This configuration is beyond my understanding of Cisco natting.&amp;nbsp; Actually most of it is beyond, but I set it up anyway.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have two connections out of our building.&amp;nbsp; Our internet link (named SirenTel), and a connection to the state network which is forwarded to another router in our DMZ.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think I need a route map to fix my problem but not sure.&amp;nbsp; I had everything configured and working, but nobody could get out of our second state link.&amp;nbsp; So I had to add this line to the configuration:&amp;nbsp; "nat (any,DMZ) after-auto source dynamic any interface"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Then the static routes to the state network started to work.&amp;nbsp; Now a new problem with any devices in the DMZ, they cannot access the internet.&amp;nbsp; Connections initiated from the internet are able to reach them correctly.&amp;nbsp; I receive this error in the log: &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;"Asymmetric NAT rules matched for forward and reverse flows; Connection for udp src DMZ:10.167.42.15/53294 dst SirenTel:8.8.8.8/53 denied due to NAT reverse path failure"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do I need a conditional nat for that DMZ link to the state network?&amp;nbsp; I need everyone on our network (multiple vlans) to be able to send through that route, so not sure how to write it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My second, unrelated problem is with trying to ping devices outside our network.&amp;nbsp; The reply gets denied due to firewall rules, but shouldn't established connections come back through?&amp;nbsp; For the few devices I wanted to monitor outside my network I had to add a permit for icmp traffic from those addresses.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Hopefully the relevant config lines:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;route SirenTel 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 64.33.171.81 2&lt;BR /&gt;route DMZ 165.189.42.0 255.255.255.0 10.167.42.1 1&lt;BR /&gt;route DMZ 165.189.52.65 255.255.255.255 10.167.42.1 1&lt;BR /&gt;route DMZ 165.189.96.0 255.255.255.0 10.167.42.1 1&lt;BR /&gt;route DMZ 167.218.0.0 255.255.0.0 10.167.42.1 1&lt;BR /&gt;route DMZ 198.150.235.253 255.255.255.255 10.167.42.1 1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;object network 10.167.42.15&lt;BR /&gt;nat (DMZ,SirenTel) static 64.33.171.93&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nat (any,DMZ) after-auto source dynamic any interface&lt;BR /&gt;nat (any,SirenTel) after-auto source dynamic any interface&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list SirenTel_access_in extended permit icmp object-group DM_INLINE_NETWORK_15 any4&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for any assistance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- James&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 03:20:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/route-map-nat-question/m-p/2401843#M306802</guid>
      <dc:creator>burnettcounty</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-12T03:20:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Route map nat question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/route-map-nat-question/m-p/2401844#M306805</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello James,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Let's start with the ICMP, to make it stateful you need:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Fixup protocol icmp.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For the NAT&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;object-group network DMZ_Subnets&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; network-object 165.189.42.0 255.255.255.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; network-object 165.189.52.65 255.255.255.255&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; network-object 65.189.96.0 255.255.255.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; network-object 167.218.0.0 255.255.0.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; network-object 198.150.235.253 255.255.255.255&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; exit&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;no nat (any,DMZ) after-auto source dynamic any interface&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;no nat (any,SirenTel) after-auto source dynamic any interface&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nat (inside,dmz) source dynamic any interface destination static&amp;nbsp; &lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;DMZ_Subnets &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;DMZ_Subnets&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nat (outside,dmz) source dynamic any interface destination static&amp;nbsp; DMZ_Subnets DMZ_Subnets&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nat (inside,outside) source dynamic any interface&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nat (dmz,outside) source dynamic any interface&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Any questions &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-email-small" href="mailto:julio17carvajal@hotmail.com"&gt;julio17carvajal@hotmail.com&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;For more information about Core and Security Networking follow my website at &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://laguiadelnetworking.com"&gt;http://laguiadelnetworking.com&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cheers, &lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;Julio Carvajal Segura&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://laguiadelnetworking.com"&gt;http://laguiadelnetworking.com&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Dec 2013 01:07:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/route-map-nat-question/m-p/2401844#M306805</guid>
      <dc:creator>Julio Carvajal</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-12-21T01:07:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Route map nat question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/route-map-nat-question/m-p/2401845#M306807</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am guessing that I do not need this line if I don't need to route from outside my network through my second link.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nat (outside,dmz) source dynamic any interface destination static&amp;nbsp; DMZ_Subnets DMZ_Subnets&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And I do not have 'inside' or 'outside' defined anywhere as an interface name.&amp;nbsp; Do I need to subsitute each of my interface names for these, or can I use 'any' with that destination object group?&amp;nbsp; I have 9 internal interfaces defined because of subnetting.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the help.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Dec 2013 20:41:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/route-map-nat-question/m-p/2401845#M306807</guid>
      <dc:creator>burnettcounty</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-12-30T20:41:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

