nat object and no name

amit bhatnagar — Tue, 12 Mar 2019 03:16:28 GMT

we have ASA with image 9.1.3 we have given no name command .

source 10.1.1.1

destination 192.168.1.1

port 443 80 21

for NAT rule we have created 3 destination object on ASA with name 192.168.1.1_80 , 192.168.1.1_443 & 192.168.1.1_21

access list only one statement source 10.1.1.1 destination 192.168.1.1_80 port 80 , 443 and 21

If we try to delete object name 192.168.1.1_80 it gives error that it is used in access list .

But if I try to delete 192.168.1.1_443 & 192.168.1.1_21 it doesnt give me any alert and deletes the object but it removes the NAT .

My understanding is unless object is present in access list it will be removed .

Just want to know what is best practice I should add the network object 192.168.1.1_443 & 192.168.1.1_21 in access-list as well .

Thanks for help

Re:nat object and no name

Julio Carvajal — Thu, 12 Dec 2013 02:24:42 GMT

Hello,

If you are using auto NAT anytime u delete an object the existing configuration withing the object (including NAT) will be lost!

I hope I did understood ur problem.

Regards

Sent from Cisco Technical Support Android App

topic Re:nat object and no name in Network Security

nat object and no name

Re:nat object and no name