<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Securing with NAT - Best Practice ? in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/securing-with-nat-best-practice/m-p/2337504#M311481</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;It is forbidden to do NAT Exempt from Internal to DMZ ?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I hear there is a compliance in banking that 2 server who needs to communicate but its forbidden to know each other ip address ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;How about NAT as second layer or firewall ?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;What is best practice to secure enterprise network from NAT point of view ?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;Thx&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 02:47:49 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>superlubis</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-03-12T02:47:49Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Securing with NAT - Best Practice ?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/securing-with-nat-best-practice/m-p/2337504#M311481</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;It is forbidden to do NAT Exempt from Internal to DMZ ?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I hear there is a compliance in banking that 2 server who needs to communicate but its forbidden to know each other ip address ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;How about NAT as second layer or firewall ?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;What is best practice to secure enterprise network from NAT point of view ?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;Thx&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 02:47:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/securing-with-nat-best-practice/m-p/2337504#M311481</guid>
      <dc:creator>superlubis</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-12T02:47:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Securing with NAT - Best Practice ?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/securing-with-nat-best-practice/m-p/2337505#M311482</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello Ibrahim,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;No, not at all, that is not a restriction at all. You can do it if needed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now looks like in your enviroment is a requirement that this 2 servers communicate with each other but they will not know each other IP address.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Then NAT is your friend as will satisfy the requirement you are looking for.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Well I do not consider NAT to be a security measure as for me it does not perform any inspection, any rule set any policy ,etc but I can ensure you there are a lot of people that think about it as a security measure.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I see it as an IP service that allows us to preserve the IP address space.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;For more information about Core and Security Networking follow my website at &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://laguiadelnetworking.com"&gt;http://laguiadelnetworking.com&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Any question contact me at &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-email-small" href="mailto:jcarvaja@laguiadelnetworking.com"&gt;jcarvaja@laguiadelnetworking.com&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;Cheers, &lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;Julio Carvajal Segura&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 05 Oct 2013 17:44:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/securing-with-nat-best-practice/m-p/2337505#M311482</guid>
      <dc:creator>Julio Carvajal</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-10-05T17:44:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Securing with NAT - Best Practice ?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/securing-with-nat-best-practice/m-p/2337506#M311484</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes the same with me, and what i learn from CCNA or CCNP book is NAT is just for many local client accessing the internet and for translating ip private server to ip public server. Can i tighten up security with NAT ? whats is the best practice in cisco ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 06 Oct 2013 02:22:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/securing-with-nat-best-practice/m-p/2337506#M311484</guid>
      <dc:creator>superlubis</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-10-06T02:22:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Securing with NAT - Best Practice ?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/securing-with-nat-best-practice/m-p/2337507#M311486</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And on the CCNA Track we also heard that NAT is for security purposes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Again I dont think that way.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; Can i tighten up security with NAT ? whats is the best practice in cisco ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;No, I mean what can you implement with NAT that will make your network more secure? Nothing.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You must think about content filtering, packet inspections, ACL, traffic encryption, Role based access, etc. Those kind of things that will make the network more secure &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="grin" __jive_macro_name="emoticon" class="jive_macro jive_emote" src="https://community.cisco.com/4.5.4/images/emoticons/grin.gif"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;For more information about Core and Security Networking follow my website at &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://laguiadelnetworking.com"&gt;http://laguiadelnetworking.com&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Any question contact me at &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-email-small" href="mailto:jcarvaja@laguiadelnetworking.com"&gt;jcarvaja@laguiadelnetworking.com&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;Cheers, &lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;Julio Carvajal Segura&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 06 Oct 2013 06:48:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/securing-with-nat-best-practice/m-p/2337507#M311486</guid>
      <dc:creator>Julio Carvajal</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-10-06T06:48:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

