<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic NAT a port range on Cisco 1921 in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-a-port-range-on-cisco-1921/m-p/2320164#M311639</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I see what you mean there is no way to make this happen automatically, you will need to enter each of the NAT statements one by one,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This has been discussed previously on this place.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have seen this "workaround mentioned before"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE dir="ltr" style="line-height: 18px; color: #444444; background-color: #e4edf2; border: 1px inset; font-size: 13px; padding: 4px; width: 640px; height: 114px; overflow: auto;"&gt;access-list 101 permit&amp;nbsp; tcp host 192.168.2.1 any range 2000 2100 any

route-map NAT permit 10
match ip add 101

ip nat inside source static x.x.x.x y.y.y.y&amp;nbsp; route-map NAT&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But I have never play with it so I cannot tell you that it will work.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It would be easier ofcourse to get a dedicated IP address but that involves money,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jcarvaja&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 12 Oct 2013 19:35:55 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Julio Carvajal</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-10-12T19:35:55Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>NAT a port range on Cisco 1921</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-a-port-range-on-cisco-1921/m-p/2320163#M311638</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've read various posts regarding natting a range of ports and have not found a quick way of doing this for my situation.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a phone system with a processor card and processor expansion card on separate internal IP addresses.&amp;nbsp; In order to have a phone outside the network that is not connected via vpn I have to nat a different range of ports from each of the internal phone card IP's to the same public IP.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there any way to achieve this through route-maps?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For now, I have natted each port individually (thousands) resulting in a monster running-config.&amp;nbsp; The router is also not adhering to what I've entered - ie the config line is shown below together with the actual port that is natted:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;ip nat inside source static udp 10.22.0.81 7024 222.201.202.203 7024 route-map rmap-nat extendable&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;1921#sh ip nat translations udp | inc 10.22.0.81&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;udp 222.201.202.203:7039 10.22.0.81:7024&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 111.101.102.103:5006 111.101.102.103:5006&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What's going on?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cammy&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 02:46:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-a-port-range-on-cisco-1921/m-p/2320163#M311638</guid>
      <dc:creator>Cameron Webster</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-12T02:46:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>NAT a port range on Cisco 1921</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-a-port-range-on-cisco-1921/m-p/2320164#M311639</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I see what you mean there is no way to make this happen automatically, you will need to enter each of the NAT statements one by one,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This has been discussed previously on this place.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have seen this "workaround mentioned before"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE dir="ltr" style="line-height: 18px; color: #444444; background-color: #e4edf2; border: 1px inset; font-size: 13px; padding: 4px; width: 640px; height: 114px; overflow: auto;"&gt;access-list 101 permit&amp;nbsp; tcp host 192.168.2.1 any range 2000 2100 any

route-map NAT permit 10
match ip add 101

ip nat inside source static x.x.x.x y.y.y.y&amp;nbsp; route-map NAT&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But I have never play with it so I cannot tell you that it will work.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It would be easier ofcourse to get a dedicated IP address but that involves money,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jcarvaja&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 12 Oct 2013 19:35:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-a-port-range-on-cisco-1921/m-p/2320164#M311639</guid>
      <dc:creator>Julio Carvajal</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-10-12T19:35:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

