<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Phase-2 PFS Problem in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/phase-2-pfs-problem/m-p/2283095#M342685</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you have PFS enabled on one end it has to be also enabled on the other end.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is additional security for the IPSEC tunnel encryption keys using deffie helman groups, not having this setting matched on both ends will affect the traffic.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Tariq&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 21 Sep 2013 01:17:04 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Tariq Bader</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-09-21T01:17:04Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Phase-2 PFS Problem</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/phase-2-pfs-problem/m-p/2283094#M342684</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi All,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Faced some kind of strange problem when setting up VPN tunnle between cisco routers &amp;amp; Juniper ISG firewall.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Problem what we faced is , VPN tunnel came up in phase-1 &amp;amp; phase-2 also and we were able to to icmp &amp;amp; telnet test as well.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;however when users came on work they faced frequent disconnection..i mean first webpage used to open &amp;amp; next no....or in other applictions first sessions used to go through but next not..since i was not on battel field i dont know exact logs which showing status in terms of connection.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But when investigated what i found is PFS in Cisco router was disable &amp;amp; where as in Juniper it was enabled at with Group-1.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I feel issue could have happen due to PFS only...can someone please help me to know if that is the reason? (Verfied MSS erros but didnt see those).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yogesh&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 02:41:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/phase-2-pfs-problem/m-p/2283094#M342684</guid>
      <dc:creator>yogesh.suryawanshi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-12T02:41:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Phase-2 PFS Problem</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/phase-2-pfs-problem/m-p/2283095#M342685</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you have PFS enabled on one end it has to be also enabled on the other end.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is additional security for the IPSEC tunnel encryption keys using deffie helman groups, not having this setting matched on both ends will affect the traffic.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Tariq&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Sep 2013 01:17:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/phase-2-pfs-problem/m-p/2283095#M342685</guid>
      <dc:creator>Tariq Bader</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-09-21T01:17:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Phase-2 PFS Problem</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/phase-2-pfs-problem/m-p/2283096#M342686</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; Thanks Tariq,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Understood. Later what i undestood is that at Juniper end PFS Group-2 was enabled &amp;amp; cisco router end&amp;nbsp; PFS Group-1 was enabled..Do you think in that case telnet will work &amp;amp; apps dont.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In same setup with another cisco edge router PFS Group-1 was cofigured but looks that override &amp;amp; applications worked perfect. At offshore it was same Juniper &amp;amp; configurations.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yogesh&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Sep 2013 04:25:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/phase-2-pfs-problem/m-p/2283096#M342686</guid>
      <dc:creator>yogesh.suryawanshi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-09-21T04:25:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re:Phase-2 PFS Problem</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/phase-2-pfs-problem/m-p/2283097#M342687</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thsi could be really because the overhead PFS adds to tge traffic.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Do you have the df bit set or clear ?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Can you disable the PFS and see ?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Is this happen for tcp applications only or even pings ?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;To be more sure please provide your configuration.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Can you&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Sent from Cisco Technical Support Android App&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Sep 2013 06:57:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/phase-2-pfs-problem/m-p/2283097#M342687</guid>
      <dc:creator>Tariq Bader</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-09-21T06:57:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

