<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic ASA - Transparent failover pair without STP possible? in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-transparent-failover-pair-without-stp-possible/m-p/2322781#M342919</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks Julio. I'm going to recommend the routed mode even though it's likely to cause some short-term pain. But it's good to know that transparent mode should be possible if that's not an option.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2013 10:33:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>pictuscat</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-09-19T10:33:44Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ASA - Transparent failover pair without STP possible?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-transparent-failover-pair-without-stp-possible/m-p/2322779#M342917</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I’m trying to see if it is possible to introduce two transparent ASA 5520s in an Active/Standby pair between 2 switches that don't currently run any form of STP.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://community.cisco.com/legacyfs/online/legacy/8/6/3/157368-tran_fw.jpg" alt="tran_fw.jpg" class="jive-image-thumbnail jive-image" onclick="" width="450" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does anyone know if this is a supported configuration? I’m aware that if both ASA units thought that they were the master this could introduce a L2 loop but under normal operation would a failover succeed without creating a loop or is STP definitely required to achieve this set-up?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm trying to avoid having to use routed mode in this instance as re-numbering the address spaces would be quite difficult for this particular scenario.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Many thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Andy&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 02:39:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-transparent-failover-pair-without-stp-possible/m-p/2322779#M342917</guid>
      <dc:creator>pictuscat</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-12T02:39:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ASA - Transparent failover pair without STP possible?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-transparent-failover-pair-without-stp-possible/m-p/2322780#M342918</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello Andy,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Exactly, while one unit is on standby mode it will not introduce any loop as it will not be forwarding any data.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;That being said it's a supported scenario&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;For more information about Core and Security Networking follow my website at &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://laguiadelnetworking.com"&gt;http://laguiadelnetworking.com&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Any question contact me at &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-email-small" href="mailto:jcarvaja@laguiadelnetworking.com"&gt;jcarvaja@laguiadelnetworking.com&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;Cheers, &lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;Julio Carvajal Segura&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2013 18:35:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-transparent-failover-pair-without-stp-possible/m-p/2322780#M342918</guid>
      <dc:creator>Julio Carvajal</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-09-16T18:35:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ASA - Transparent failover pair without STP possible?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-transparent-failover-pair-without-stp-possible/m-p/2322781#M342919</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks Julio. I'm going to recommend the routed mode even though it's likely to cause some short-term pain. But it's good to know that transparent mode should be possible if that's not an option.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2013 10:33:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-transparent-failover-pair-without-stp-possible/m-p/2322781#M342919</guid>
      <dc:creator>pictuscat</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-09-19T10:33:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

